Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multiunit normalized cross correlation differs from the average single-unit normalized correlation

P Bedenbaugh1, G L Gerstein

  • 1Department of Otolaryngology, University of California at San Francisco 94143, USA.

Neural Computation
|August 15, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Recordings, behaviour and models related to corticothalamic feedback.

Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences·2003
Same author

Signal-to-noise ratio improvement in multiple electrode recording.

Journal of neuroscience methods·2002
Same author

Neural assemblies: technical issues, analysis, and modeling.

Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society·2001
Same author

Reorganization in awake rat auditory cortex by local microstimulation and its effect on frequency-discrimination behavior.

Journal of neurophysiology·2001
Same author

Daily variation and appetitive conditioning-induced plasticity of auditory cortex receptive fields.

The European journal of neuroscience·2001
Same author

Determination of response latency and its application to normalization of cross-correlation measures.

Neural computation·2001
Same journal

A Model-Free Reinforcement Learning Implementation of Decision Making Under Uncertainty by Sequential Sampling.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

DROP: Distributional and Regular Optimism and Pessimism for Reinforcement Learning.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Hierarchical Active Inference Using Successor Representations.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

W-Kernel and Its Principal Space for Frequentist Evaluation of Bayesian Estimators.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

A Hidden Markov Model-Inspired Sequence Classification Method for Hyperdimensional Computing.

Neural computation·2026
Same journal

Sparse Graphical Modeling for Electrophysiological Phase-Based Connectivity Using Circular Statistics.

Neural computation·2026
See all related articles

Multiunit cluster cross-correlation offers a more sensitive detection of neuronal relationships than single-unit cross-correlation. However, interpreting these multiunit correlations requires careful consideration of the number of neurons recorded.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Computational Neuroscience
  • Systems Neuroscience

Background:

  • Advancements in neural recording technology enable simultaneous multi-site brain activity measurements.
  • Cross-correlation analysis is increasingly used to study neuronal synchrony at single-unit and multiunit cluster levels.
  • The relationship between single-unit and multiunit cluster correlations remains underexplored.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the relationship between normalized cross-correlation (NCC) of single-unit spike trains and multiunit clusters.
  • To explore how NCC scales with the number of units within a multiunit cluster.
  • To determine if multiunit cross-correlation offers enhanced sensitivity for detecting neuronal relationships compared to single-unit analysis.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Calculation of normalized cross-correlation (NCC) between single-unit spike trains.
  • Calculation of NCC between multiunit clusters recorded from the rat somatosensory cortex.
  • Analysis of the scaling of NCC with varying numbers of units in multiunit clusters.

    • Main Results:

    • The NCC values calculated for small clusters of units were consistently larger than those for single units.
    • Multiunit cross-correlation demonstrated higher sensitivity in detecting neuronal relationships compared to single-unit cross-correlation.
    • The interpretation of changes in multiunit cross-correlation is complex, influenced by the number of recorded cells and correlation patterns within and between electrodes.

    Conclusions:

    • Multiunit cluster cross-correlation provides a more sensitive measure of neuronal relationships than single-unit analysis.
    • The increased NCC in multiunit clusters suggests potential for detecting weaker or more distributed neuronal interactions.
    • Careful consideration of recording parameters, such as the number of units per electrode, is crucial for accurate interpretation of multiunit cross-correlation data.