Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Contemporary issues in rate-adaptive pacing

S S Barold1, H S Barold

  • 1Department of Medicine, Rochester General Hospital, NY 14621, USA.

Clinical Cardiology
|August 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

True vs. pseudo-electrical ventricular alternans sustained by ventricular premature complexes.

Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie·2018
Same author

A review of the atrial upper rate algorithms of St. Jude Medical (Abbott) cardiac implantable electronic devices : Incidence of repetitive nonreentrant ventriculoatrial synchrony (RNRVAS).

Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie·2017
Same author

Erratum to: Noise from a dysfunctional atrial lead detected as atrial fibrillation by a cardiac implantable electronic device.

Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie·2017
Same author

Diagnosis of myocardial infarction and ischemia in the setting of bundle branch block and cardiac pacing.

Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie·2016
Same author

Unusual cause of desynchronization in a cardiac resynchronization device.

Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie·2012
Same author

Atrial undersensing and cycle prolongation related to automatic mode switching: what is the mechanism?

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2012
Same journal

Strauss-Defined LBBB Identifies Patients With Improved Outcomes After CRT-D: A Comparative Cohort Study.

Clinical cardiology·2026
Same journal

Does Serum γKlotho Truly Provide Incremental Prognostic Value Beyond Established Risk Predictors in Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease?

Clinical cardiology·2026
Same journal

Associations of the C-Reactive Protein-Albumin-Lymphocyte Index, Red Cell Distribution Width-Albumin Ratio, and Blood Urea Nitrogen-Albumin Ratio With All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality Among Adults With Preclinical Heart Failure.

Clinical cardiology·2026
Same journal

Real-World National Databases Versus Hypothesis-Driven Cohort Studies: A Reply to the Critique on the TURK-HF Registry Design.

Clinical cardiology·2026
Same journal

Comment on Wang et al.: Unaddressed Multiple Comparisons Risk Inflating Type, Error in Cardiovascular Specialty Nursing Research.

Clinical cardiology·2026
Same journal

Methodological and Statistical Confounding in Comparing Patient-Reported Outcomes Between Cardioversion and Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Clinical cardiology·2026
See all related articles

This review explores modern rate-adaptive pacemakers, focusing on dual sensor systems and their functions. It examines how these advanced features improve pacemaker performance and patient outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Rate-adaptive pacemakers (RAPs) are crucial for optimizing cardiac function in patients with bradycardia.
  • Contemporary RAPs utilize sophisticated sensor technologies to adjust pacing rate based on physiological demand.
  • Understanding the nuances of these systems is essential for effective clinical application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review current clinical questions regarding contemporary rate-adaptive pacemakers.
  • To elucidate the role and integration of dual sensor systems in modern pacemakers.
  • To discuss advanced features such as sensor blending, automaticity, and non-rate-related functions.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of contemporary research on rate-adaptive pacemakers.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of data pertaining to dual sensor systems and their clinical impact.
  • Discussion of key areas including sensor cross-checking, automaticity, and arrhythmia prevention.

    • Main Results:

    • Dual sensor systems offer enhanced accuracy and reliability in rate adaptation.
    • Sensor blending and cross-checking improve the robustness of pacemaker responses.
    • Non-rate-related sensor functions provide additional clinical benefits beyond rate control.

    Conclusions:

    • Contemporary rate-adaptive pacemakers with dual sensor systems represent a significant advancement in cardiac pacing.
    • Effective utilization of advanced features like sensor blending and automaticity is key to maximizing therapeutic benefits.
    • Further research into non-rate-related functions holds promise for expanded clinical applications.