Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Systems and instruments for laparoscopic surgery without pneumoperitoneum

C N Gutt1, J Daume, B Schaeff

  • 1Department of General Surgery, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-University, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

Surgical Endoscopy
|August 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Randomized controlled trial of robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic fundoplication: 12 years follow-up.

Surgical endoscopy·2022
Same author

Stress Impairs Intentional Memory Control through Altered Theta Oscillations in Lateral Parietal Cortex.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2020
Same author

Dissection with LigaSure Impact™ versus conventional resection in pylorus-preserving partial pancreatoduodenectomy (DISSECT): a single-institution randomized controlled trial.

Langenbeck's archives of surgery·2020
Same author

Personal solar ultraviolet radiation dosimetry in an occupational setting across Europe.

Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV·2020
Same author

Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Exposure Assessment in a Refractory Brick Production.

Annals of work exposures and health·2019
Same author

Nerve Growth Factor (NGF) up-regulation in the cerebrospinal fluid of newborns with myelomeningocele.

European review for medical and pharmacological sciences·2014
Same journal

Impact of the fibrosis-4 index on postoperative complications in patients undergoing laparoscopic liver resection.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Advanced robotic liver surgery.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Efficacy and safety of transoral incisionless fundoplication in non-obese and obese adults: a population-based cohort study from the United States.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Minimally invasive versus open surgery for adhesive small bowel obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Enhanced view/extended totally extraperitoneal plasty (eTEP) Rives-Stoppa repair versus open Rives-Stoppa repair: a single-center retrospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
Same journal

Robotic-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection: a scoping review of preclinical and early clinical evidence.

Surgical endoscopy·2026
See all related articles

Exploring alternatives to carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic surgery, this study reviews abdominal wall lifting systems. These methods aim to reduce physiological adverse effects and technical disadvantages associated with gas insufflation.

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Technology

Background:

  • Carbon dioxide insufflation (pneumoperitoneum) is standard for laparoscopic surgery.
  • Pneumoperitoneum presents physiological drawbacks and technical limitations.
  • Alternative abdominal wall lifting methods are being investigated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing and emerging methods for abdominal wall lifting in laparoscopy.
  • To compare systems based on their reliance on gas insufflation and impact on surgical exposure.
  • To evaluate the compatibility of these systems with standard laparoscopic instruments.

Main Methods:

  • Review of intra-abdominal and subcutaneous retraction systems.
  • Categorization of systems based on gas insufflation requirements.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of systems' impact on internal organ exposure and pressure.
  • Evaluation of instrument compatibility with conventional laparoscopic tools.

    • Main Results:

    • Two main categories of retraction systems exist: intra-abdominal and subcutaneous lifting.
    • Some systems require supplementary pneumoperitoneum for adequate exposure.
    • Other systems operate without gas insufflation, offering potential technical advantages.
    • Certain systems integrate abdominal wall lifting with internal organ pressure management.
    • All reviewed methods accommodate standard laparoscopic instruments designed for pneumoperitoneum.

    Conclusions:

    • Alternative abdominal wall lifting techniques offer solutions to pneumoperitoneum's limitations.
    • Systems avoiding gas insufflation may enable combined laparoscopic and open surgical approaches.
    • Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum with mechanical augmentation can mitigate physiological disadvantages.
    • Further research into gasless laparoscopic techniques is warranted for enhanced surgical outcomes.