Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy

Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy

Optical microscopy uses optic principles to provide detailed images of samples. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek designed the first compound optical microscope in the 17th century to visualize blood cells, bacteria, and yeast cells. In 1830, Joseph Jackson Lister created an essentially modern light microscope. The 20th century saw the development of microscopes with enhanced magnification and resolution.
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...

Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy

Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy

Confocal microscopy is an advanced microscopic technique. The prime advantage of the confocal microscope over other microscopy techniques is its ability to block the out-of-focus light from the illuminated samples using pinholes. It is widely used with fluorescence optics to obtain high-resolution, sharp contrast images. Unlike optical microscopes, confocal microscopes use a focused beam of light laser to scan the entire sample surface at different z-planes. These microscopes are, therefore,...

Three-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology

Three-Dimensional Microscopy in Microbiology

Three-dimensional imaging techniques are essential in cell biology, allowing researchers to visualize intricate cellular structures with high resolution. Two prominent methods, Differential Interference Contrast Microscopy (DIC) and Confocal Scanning Laser Microscopy (CSLM), provide distinct advantages for imaging live and thick specimens, respectively.Differential Interference Contrast MicroscopyDIC microscopy enhances contrast in transparent, unstained samples by converting phase...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics·2016

Same author

Storage and retrieval of digital images in dermatology.

Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)·2016

Same author

[Percutaneous myocardial laserrevascularization (PMR), a new therapy for patients with refractory angina pectoris].

Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie·2016

Same author

[Immunotherapy of uveal melanoma: vaccination against cancer. Multicenter adjuvant phase 3 vaccination study using dendritic cells laden with tumor RNA for large newly diagnosed uveal melanoma].

Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft·2015

Same author

[Myocarditis in the differential diagnosis of cardiomyopathies. Endomyocardial biopsy or MRI?].

Herz·2015

Same author

Measurement of the charge asymmetry in top quark pair production in <i>pp</i> collisions at [Formula: see text] using the ATLAS detector.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2015

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 25, 2026

A Standardized Approach to Extra-Oral and Intra-Oral Digital Photography

A Standardized Approach to Extra-Oral and Intra-Oral Digital Photography

Published on: July 22, 2022

Resolution requirements for digital images in dermatology

A Bittorf¹, M Fartasch, G Schuler

¹Department of Dermatology, University of Erlangen, Germany.

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

|August 1, 1997

Summary

Digital images are crucial in dermatology. A resolution of 768 x 512 x 24 pixels is sufficient for dermatologists to accurately diagnose skin lesions from digital images.

More Related Videos

Combining Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Optical Coherence Tomography for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Skin Cancers via Image Acquisition

Combining Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Optical Coherence Tomography for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Skin Cancers via Image Acquisition

Published on: August 18, 2022

Dermoscopy Aids in the Diagnosis of Discoid Lupus Erythematosus

Dermoscopy Aids in the Diagnosis of Discoid Lupus Erythematosus

Published on: May 16, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 25, 2026

A Standardized Approach to Extra-Oral and Intra-Oral Digital Photography

A Standardized Approach to Extra-Oral and Intra-Oral Digital Photography

Published on: July 22, 2022

Combining Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Optical Coherence Tomography for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Skin Cancers via Image Acquisition

Combining Reflectance Confocal Microscopy with Optical Coherence Tomography for Noninvasive Diagnosis of Skin Cancers via Image Acquisition

Published on: August 18, 2022

Dermoscopy Aids in the Diagnosis of Discoid Lupus Erythematosus

Dermoscopy Aids in the Diagnosis of Discoid Lupus Erythematosus

Published on: May 16, 2025

Area of Science:

Dermatology
Medical Imaging
Digital Health

Background:

Digital imaging is increasingly vital in dermatology.
Advancements in computer hardware, networks, and the internet facilitate its use.

Purpose of the Study:

To determine the optimal resolution requirements for digital dermatological images.
To assess the impact of image resolution on diagnostic accuracy.

Main Methods:

Eight dermatological images were digitized at five resolutions (192x128x24 to 3072x2048x24).
Six dermatologists evaluated image quality and diagnostic utility using a standardized questionnaire.
Comparison of image sets at varying resolutions.

Main Results:

Images at 768x512x24 resolution were perceived as equivalent to higher resolutions.
A noticeable difference in image quality was observed between 768x512x24 and 384x256x24 resolutions.
The slide projector used significantly influenced image rating.

Conclusions:

A resolution of 768x512x24 is adequate for recognizing critical details in dermatological images.
This resolution ensures effective diagnostic capabilities in digital dermatology.
Optimizing digital image resolution enhances diagnostic efficiency.