Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Calculating vascular resistances

J W Skimming1, S Cassin, W W Nichols

  • 1Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville 32610-0296, USA.

Clinical Cardiology
|September 19, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Canadian Surgery Forum.

Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie·2022
Same author

A model-based analysis of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices of avibactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases·2018
Same author

Pharmacodynamics of ceftazidime/avibactam against extracellular and intracellular forms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy·2017
Same author

The postantibiotic effect and post-β-lactamase-inhibitor effect of ceftazidime, ceftaroline and aztreonam in combination with avibactam against target Gram-negative bacteria.

Letters in applied microbiology·2016
Same author

Activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against fluoroquinolone-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy·2015
Same author

Validity and reliability of aortic pulse wave velocity and augmentation index determined by the new cuff-based SphygmoCor Xcel.

Journal of human hypertension·2014
Same journal

In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Detection Performance Analysis and Comparison on Effective Feature Selection.

Clinical cardiology·2026
Same journal

Interpreting the Association Between Diuretic Intensity Score and Mortality: The Potential Roles of Diuretic Responsiveness and Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist Therapy.

Clinical cardiology·2026
Same journal

Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction-Like Phenotype in Coronary Artery Disease and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Insights From the RICCADSA Cohort.

Clinical cardiology·2026
Same journal

Ethanol Infusion Into the Vein of Marshall for Atrial Fibrillation: Clinical Efficacy and Technical Limitations.

Clinical cardiology·2026
Same journal

Methodological Considerations Regarding Diuretic Intensity Score and Mortality in Hospitalized Heart Failure Patients.

Clinical cardiology·2026
Same journal

Inpatient Outcomes and Complications After Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in Rural Versus Urban Hospitals in the United States.

Clinical cardiology·2026
See all related articles

Physicians face ambiguity in vascular resistance calculations, impacting treatment decisions. This report clarifies these calculations and offers methods for predicting normal vascular resistance values.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular physiology
  • Medical calculations
  • Clinical decision-making

Background:

  • Vascular resistance calculations are crucial for therapeutic decisions in patient care.
  • Current methods and terminology for calculating vascular resistance contain ambiguities.
  • Lack of standardized methods hinders accurate clinical application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify ambiguities in vascular resistance calculations.
  • To standardize terminology and methods used in vascular resistance assessment.
  • To propose reliable methods for predicting normal vascular resistance.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing literature on vascular resistance calculations.
  • Analysis of common ambiguities in terminology and units.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a framework for consistent calculation and prediction.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified key areas of ambiguity in vascular resistance calculations.
    • Proposed standardized definitions and units for clarity.
    • Presented predictive models for normal vascular resistance ranges.

    Conclusions:

    • Clarifying vascular resistance calculations improves therapeutic decision-making.
    • Standardized methods enhance the reliability of vascular resistance assessments.
    • Predictive models aid in identifying normal vascular resistance for clinical practice.