Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 18, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Expectancy x value effects: regulatory focus as determinant of magnitude and direction
1Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA. jshah@bss3.umd.edu
Abstract:
The authors propose that a promotion focus involves construal of achievement goals as aspirations whose attainment brings accomplishment. Commitment to these accomplishment goals is characterized by attempts to attain the highest expected utility. In contrast, a prevention focus involves construal of achievement goals as responsibilities whose attainment brings security. Commitment to these security goals is characterized by doing what is necessary. The different nature of commitment to accomplishment goals versus security goals is predicted to influence the interactive effect of goal expectancy and goal value on goal commitment, as evident in both task performance and decision making. Four studies found that the classic positive interactive effect of expectancy and value on goal commitment increases with a promotion focus and decreases with a prevention focus.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Regulation
Self-Efficacy
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Framing Effects
Regression Toward the Mean
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...

