Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Isolation of specific interference processing in the Stroop task: PET activation studies

S F Taylor1, S Kornblum, E J Lauber

  • 1Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.

Neuroimage
|August 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

3D-SSP analysis for amyloid brain PET imaging using <sup>18</sup>F-florbetapir in patients with Alzheimer's dementia and mild cognitive impairment.

The Medical journal of Malaysia·2021
Same author

Changes in cerebral metabolic activity in men undergoing androgen deprivation therapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2018
Same author

Erimopyrone, a Lignan Derivative from the Liverwort Moerckia erimona.

Bioscience, biotechnology, and biochemistry·2016
Same author

Diabetes, Gray Matter Loss, and Cognition in the Setting of Parkinson Disease.

Academic radiology·2016
Same author

Establishing Amyloid PET Imaging Biomarkers: Ongoing Efforts.

AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology·2015
Same author

It still hurts: altered endogenous opioid activity in the brain during social rejection and acceptance in major depressive disorder.

Molecular psychiatry·2015
Same journal

Segmentation of the parasagittal dura mater on multi-center 3D-FLAIR MRI.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Spatial frequency channels implement a mental ruler in spatial vision.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Exploring the Link Between Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Measured Brain Diffusivity During Wakefulness and Sleep Macrostructure in the Elderly.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Closed-loop adaptation of transcranial magnetic stimulation intensity with electroencephalography feedback.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Volumetric postmortem MRI of the medial temporal lobe in Alzheimer's disease and related disorders: methodological advances and implications for in vivo biomarker development.

NeuroImage·2026
Same journal

Neural responses to equity and inequity when receiving vicarious rewards for self and charity during adolescence.

NeuroImage·2026
See all related articles

The Stroop task reveals specific brain activity in the left inferior frontal gyrus for selective attention. Deactivation in the right superior temporal gyrus suggests non-specific processing during interference tasks.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Experimental Psychology

Background:

  • The Stroop task is a key paradigm for studying selective attention.
  • Previous cerebral blood flow (CBF) studies show inconsistent activation patterns, possibly due to non-specific responses like arousal.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify brain regions consistently involved in Stroop interference processing.
  • To differentiate specific Stroop interference networks from general arousal or non-specific interference.

Main Methods:

  • Two experiments using a Stroop interference paradigm with lexical and non-lexical control conditions.
  • Experiment 1: Contrasted Stroop stimuli with color naming of non-color words and false fonts.
  • Experiment 2: Compared Stroop stimuli with colored symbols and a taboo word control condition to elicit non-specific interference.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Consistent cerebral blood flow changes were observed in only two brain regions across both experiments.
  • Activation in the left inferior frontal gyrus was specific to Stroop interference processing.
  • Deactivation in the right superior temporal gyrus was observed for both Stroop and taboo conditions, indicating non-specific processing.

Conclusions:

  • The left inferior frontal gyrus is consistently implicated in specific Stroop interference processing.
  • The right superior temporal gyrus deactivation suggests a role in non-specific interference or arousal.
  • Anterior cingulate cortex activation was inconsistent, questioning its central role in overcoming Stroop interference.