Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Superantigens as immunomodulators: recent structural insights

A C Papageorgiou1, K R Acharya

  • 1Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, United Kingdom.

Structure (London, England : 1993)
|August 15, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identifying On-Surface Site-Selective Chemical Conversions by Theory-Aided NEXAFS Spectroscopy: The Case of Free-Base Corroles on Ag(111).

Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2018
Same author

Investigating the molecule-substrate interaction of prototypic tetrapyrrole compounds: adsorption and self-metalation of porphine on Cu(111).

The Journal of chemical physics·2013
Same author

Structure based drug design of angiotensin-I converting enzyme inhibitors.

Current medicinal chemistry·2012
Same author

Structure-function relationships and clinical applications of L-asparaginases.

Current medicinal chemistry·2010
Same author

High chloroplast haplotype diversity in Greek populations of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.).

Plant biology (Stuttgart, Germany)·2009
Same author

A family of killer toxins. Exploring the mechanism of ADP-ribosylating toxins.

The FEBS journal·2006
Same journal

Structure of Perinereis linea erythrocruorin reveals a compact extracellular globin megacomplex.

Structure (London, England : 1993)·2026
Same journal

Meet the author: Stephen Brohawn.

Structure (London, England : 1993)·2026
Same journal

Tetraspanins bring Norrin into focus: Structural insights into ligand-specific Wnt signaling.

Structure (London, England : 1993)·2026
Same journal

Uncovering subtype-selective activation of the K<sub>Ca</sub>3.1 channel by SKA-111.

Structure (London, England : 1993)·2026
Same journal

Identification and structure determination of a type III-Bv CRISPR complex that post-translationally modifies an associated toxin.

Structure (London, England : 1993)·2026
Same journal

Cryo-EM structure of the Arabidopsisthaliana ribosome in translating and non-translating states.

Structure (London, England : 1993)·2026
See all related articles

Superantigens bind to MHC class II and T-cell receptors, triggering T-cell responses. Diverse binding modes explain variations in superantigen interactions and biological activities.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Structural Biology

Background:

  • Superantigens are microbial toxins that potently activate T cells.
  • They bridge Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class II molecules and T-cell receptors (TcRs).
  • This interaction leads to T-cell proliferation and cytokine release, contributing to immune responses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the structural basis for the diverse interactions of superantigens with MHC class II and TcRs.
  • To understand how different binding modes influence superantigen biological properties.

Main Methods:

  • X-ray crystallography was employed to determine the structures of superantigen-MHC class II-TcR complexes.
  • Biochemical experiments were conducted to assess the functional consequences of different binding modes.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Structural studies revealed multiple distinct modes of cross-linking MHC class II molecules and TcRs by superantigens.
  • These different modes involve variations in the orientation and contact points between the three components.
  • Biochemical data correlated specific binding modes with differential T-cell activation and cytokine production profiles.

Conclusions:

  • Superantigens utilize diverse structural mechanisms to engage MHC class II and TcRs.
  • The mode of interaction significantly impacts the resulting T-cell response and superantigen pathogenicity.
  • Understanding these varied interactions is crucial for developing targeted immunotherapies.