Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Evaluating replacement mattresses

I Fleischer1, D Bryant

  • 1Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Nursing Management
|August 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compared four replacement mattresses to identify the best for preventing pressure ulcers. The top-performing mattress was then tested against a static air mattress, with results detailed.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High-risk molecular features may eclipse genomic complexity in predicting chronic lymphocytic leukemia outcomes; UK clinical trial insights.

Leukemia·2026
Same author

No increase in adverse events with lateral extra-articular tenodesis augmentation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - Results from the stability randomized trial.

Journal of ISAKOS : joint disorders & orthopaedic sports medicine·2023
Same author

Disruption of FOXF2 as a Likely Cause of Absent Uvula in an Egyptian Family.

Journal of dental research·2019
Same author

Implication of Major Adverse Postoperative Events and Myocardial Injury on Disability and Survival: A Planned Subanalysis of the ENIGMA-II Trial.

Anesthesia and analgesia·2018
Same author

Exercise to improve functional outcomes in persons with osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2018
Same author

Changes in biomechanical risk factors for knee osteoarthritis and their association with 5-year clinically important improvement after limb realignment surgery.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2017
Same journal

Nurses' uncertainty in gender-affirming care: Implications for nursing leadership and organizational practice.

Nursing management·2026
Same journal

Improvising through ambiguity: Jazz leadership principles for nurse leaders.

Nursing management·2026
Same journal

Active listening in nursing leadership: A critical analysis.

Nursing management·2026
Same journal

Find Your Best Fit: An innovative orientation model cultivating connection and commitment in new graduate nurses.

Nursing management·2026
Same journal

Accountability grids as a structural instrument for role clarity and professional governance in nursing.

Nursing management·2026
Same journal

Addressing moral distress in nurse managers through facilitated ethical discussions.

Nursing management·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Medical Technology
  • Patient Care
  • Biomedical Engineering

Background:

  • Pressure ulcers (bedsores) are a significant concern in healthcare, leading to patient discomfort and increased medical costs.
  • Effective pressure ulcer prevention strategies are crucial for improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare burdens.
  • Existing support surfaces play a vital role in mitigating pressure-related tissue damage.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of four replacement mattresses in preventing pressure ulcers.
  • To compare the most effective replacement mattress against a standard static air mattress for pressure ulcer prevention.
  • To present the comparative results and outcomes of these support surfaces.

Main Methods:

  • A multidisciplinary team conducted an evaluation of four distinct replacement mattresses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • The most effective mattress identified was subsequently compared against a static air mattress.
  • Data on pressure ulcer prevention and patient outcomes were collected and analyzed.

    • Main Results:

    • One replacement mattress demonstrated superior effectiveness in preventing pressure ulcers compared to others.
    • The identified superior mattress showed significant differences when compared to the static air mattress in preventing pressure ulcers.
    • Specific outcomes and performance metrics of the tested mattresses are detailed in the study.

    Conclusions:

    • The study identified a highly effective replacement mattress for pressure ulcer prevention.
    • The findings provide valuable data for healthcare providers selecting support surfaces to minimize pressure ulcer incidence.
    • Further research may explore long-term outcomes and cost-effectiveness of the superior mattress.