Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sex differences in intelligence. Implications for education

D F Halpern1

  • 1Department of Psychology, California State University, San Bernardino 92407, USA. dhalpern@wiley.csusb.edu

The American Psychologist
|November 5, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sex differences in visuospatial working memory: components of cognitive processing.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Stereotypes and steroids: using a psychobiosocial model to understand cognitive sex differences.

Brain and cognition·2001
Same author

Mapping cognitive processes onto the brain: mind the gap.

Brain and cognition·2000
Same author

Handedness and sex differences in intelligence: evidence from the medical college admission test.

Brain and cognition·1998
Same author

Teaching critical thinking for transfer across domains. Dispositions, skills, structure training, and metacognitive monitoring.

The American psychologist·1998
Same author

The correlates of left-handedness: moderating variables in the epidemiology of left-handedness.

Annals of epidemiology·1997
Same journal

Cumulative adverse childhood experiences and parent-reported allergic conditions and asthma among U.S. children: A nationally representative study.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Natural disaster, social cohesion, and prosociality: A natural experiment.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Practice guidelines regarding psychologists' involvement in pharmacological issues.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

International Competences for Undergraduate Psychology (ICUP): A constructive shift for psychology?

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Two dimensions of access: Availability and affordability of mental health care across the United States.

The American psychologist·2026
Same journal

Revisiting secondary antisemitism: Antisemitism as a cause, not a consequence, of ingroup-serving Holocaust distortions.

The American psychologist·2026
See all related articles

Sex differences in intelligence show females excel in language and fine motor skills, while males perform better in spatial reasoning and abstract math. A psychobiosocial model integrates biology and environment.

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Cognitive Science
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Sex differences in intelligence is a politically sensitive area in psychology.
  • Existing research indicates average differences in cognitive abilities between sexes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review and synthesize findings on sex differences in cognitive abilities.
  • To propose a psychobiosocial model to explain these differences.
  • To discuss societal implications for education and learning.

Main Methods:

  • Review of multiple studies on sex differences in intelligence.
  • Analysis of performance on various cognitive tasks.
  • Development of a theoretical model integrating biological and environmental factors.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Females, on average, outperform males in tasks involving phonological/semantic access, prose comprehension, fine motor skills, and perceptual speed.
  • Males, on average, excel in visual-spatial working memory, aiming, spatiotemporal responding, and fluid reasoning, particularly in abstract math/science.
  • Males are over-represented in low-ability distributions for conditions like intellectual disability, attention disorders, dyslexia, and speech delays.

Conclusions:

  • A psychobiosocial model offers a comprehensive alternative to simplistic nature-nurture debates.
  • Understanding these differences is crucial for tailored educational strategies.
  • Further research should explore the interplay of biological and environmental factors.