Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Future research directions in laterality

J G Beaumont1

  • 1Department of Clinical Psychology, Royal Hospital for Neurodisability, Putney, London, UK.

Neuropsychology Review
|October 27, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Advanced multiple sclerosis and the psychosocial impact on families.

Psychology & health·2010
Same author

Psychological adjustment to locked-in syndrome.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2007
Same author

The relationship between subjective fatigue and cognitive fatigue in advanced multiple sclerosis.

Multiple sclerosis (Houndmills, Basingstoke, England)·2007
Same author

Modality-specific aspects of sustained and divided attentional performance in multiple sclerosis.

Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists·2005
Same author

The MS Symptom and Impact Diary (MSSID): psychometric evaluation of a new instrument to measure the day to day impact of multiple sclerosis.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2004
Same author

Line bisection in normal adults: direction of attentional bias for near and far space.

Neuropsychologia·2002
Same journal

Use and Psychometric Properties of the MoCA in Spain: a Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression.

Neuropsychology review·2026
Same journal

Health Outcomes Following Traumatic Brain Injury: An Umbrella Review.

Neuropsychology review·2026
Same journal

A Systematic Review of Functional Brain Imaging Studies in Neurofibromatosis 1.

Neuropsychology review·2026
Same journal

Editorial March, 2026 Neuropsychology Review.

Neuropsychology review·2026
Same journal

Efficacy of Cognitive Training for Treating Cancer-related Cognitive Impairment: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis by Cognitive Domain.

Neuropsychology review·2026
Same journal

Immersive Virtual Reality in Neuropsychological Assessment of Acquired Brain Injury: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Neuropsychology review·2026
See all related articles

This study examines neuropsychological laterality research, questioning inferences drawn from performance asymmetries and cerebral asymmetries. It explores the biological context and psychological significance, suggesting future research directions.

Area of Science:

  • Neuropsychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Brain Sciences

Background:

  • Current research in neuropsychological laterality.
  • Established biological and psychological frameworks for laterality studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Critically evaluate the conceptual state of neuropsychological laterality research.
  • Examine the validity of inferences drawn from performance and cerebral asymmetries.
  • Discuss future directions for the field.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of existing research methodologies.
  • Review of studies on biological context and psychological significance of laterality.
  • Examination of proposed dichotomies and processing models.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Inferences in laterality research often exceed direct methodological deductions.
  • The role of interhemispheric transfer and processing stages requires further clarification.
  • The direct reflection of normal brain processes by cerebral asymmetries is questioned.

Conclusions:

  • Future neuropsychological laterality research should focus on methodological rigor.
  • Re-evaluation of current models and assumptions is necessary.
  • Clarifying the relationship between cerebral asymmetry and normal brain function is crucial.