Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Validating quality indicators for hospital care

T P Hofer1, S J Bernstein, R A Hayward

  • 1Veterans Affairs Center for Practice Management and Outcomes Research, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. thofer@umich.edu

The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
|October 31, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Michigan Risk Score to predict peripherally inserted central catheter-associated thrombosis.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2017
Same author

Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Clinical Trials: An Evaluation of 13 Large Clinical Trials Using Individual Patient Data.

Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research·2016
Same author

Screening intervals for diabetic retinopathy and incidence of visual loss: a systematic review.

Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association·2013
Same author

Variation in organ quality between liver transplant centers.

American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons·2011
Same author

Knowledge of blood pressure targets among patients with diabetes.

Primary care diabetes·2008
Same author

2-W Ho:YAG laser intracavity pumped by a diode-pumped Tm:YAG laser.

Optics letters·2007
Same journal

Conference overview: through the patient's eyes--improvement tools for the new millennium.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Balancing accountability and improvement: a case study from Massachusetts.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

The new Northwestern Memorial Hospital: planned, constructed, and operated through the patients first philosophy.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Integrating patient satisfaction into performance measurement to meet improvement challenges.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Developing partnerships among patients, families, and staff at the Medical College of Georgia Hospital and Clinics.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
Same journal

Quality improvements in end of life care: insights from two collaboratives.

The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement·2008
See all related articles

Developing effective healthcare quality indicators is crucial. A new four-step framework helps providers identify and fix quality issues within their organizations, optimizing improvement efforts and resource allocation.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Quality Improvement
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Current healthcare quality indicators are often resource-intensive and ineffective.
  • Existing indicators primarily serve external evaluations rather than internal provider improvement.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To present a four-step framework for validating healthcare quality indicators.
  • To develop indicators that help providers identify and rectify quality of care deficiencies.

Main Methods:

  • Proposing four key questions to assess indicator utility before implementation.
  • Outlining a validation method to ensure indicators detect process-outcome deficiencies.
  • Developing review instruments for identifying process problems.
  • Defining indicator sensitivity, specificity, and appropriate use for quality improvement.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The framework produces indicators that detect deficiencies in the process-outcome continuum.
  • It facilitates the creation of tools to identify these deficiencies.
  • The method documents the efficiency of using indicators for problem detection.

Conclusions:

  • Validated quality indicators are essential for providers to effectively address care deficiencies.
  • This framework enables targeted quality improvement efforts, optimizing resource utilization.
  • The proposed method supports both internal provider improvement and external quality measurement.