Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 20, 2026

Implantation of the Syncardia Total Artificial Heart
Published on: July 18, 2014
Implantable left ventricular assist devices: an evolving long-term cardiac replacement therapy
J J DeRose1, M Argenziano, B C Sun
1Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, New York, USA.
This study reviews an eight-year experience using mechanical pumps to support patients with severe heart failure. The researchers examined how these devices, originally intended as temporary bridges to heart transplants, could safely support patients living at home. Their findings suggest that these pumps offer a viable long-term treatment option with manageable risks and good survival outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular surgery research within Implantable left ventricular assist devices medicine
- Clinical cardiology and mechanical circulatory support systems
Background:
No prior work had resolved the full potential of mechanical pumps for patients living outside hospital settings. Prior research has shown that donor shortages force clinicians to seek alternative strategies for those awaiting heart transplants. That uncertainty drove the investigation into whether these mechanical systems could serve as permanent solutions. It was already known that short-term support helps stabilize individuals suffering from severe cardiac failure. This gap motivated a detailed review of an eight-year clinical experience with various pump models. Researchers needed to determine if outpatient management remained safe for individuals requiring long-term circulatory assistance. Prior studies often focused on inpatient care, leaving a void regarding home-based mechanical support outcomes. This analysis addresses how these technologies transitioned from temporary bridges to potential long-term therapies for end-stage heart disease.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this study is to evaluate the possibilities and limitations of long-term outpatient mechanical circulatory assistance. Researchers sought to determine if these devices could safely support individuals outside the hospital environment. They addressed the growing need for alternatives due to the persistent shortage of suitable cardiac donors. The investigation focuses on the transition of these pumps from temporary bridges to potential destination therapies. By analyzing eight years of clinical experience, the team examined how different device types perform in practice. They specifically explored the safety and feasibility of discharging patients with mechanical support systems. The motivation stems from the need to improve quality of life for those suffering from end-stage heart disease. This work provides a comprehensive look at the clinical outcomes associated with long-term mechanical heart support.
Main Methods:
The review approach involved analyzing clinical data from 85 patients treated between 1990 and 1997. Investigators categorized participants based on the specific mechanical pump model received during their surgical intervention. They tracked survival metrics for those awaiting transplantation or those who eventually underwent device removal. The team documented the duration of both inpatient and home-based support for every participant. Clinical staff monitored complications, specifically focusing on right-sided cardiac dysfunction and thromboembolic occurrences. They assessed the impact of various pharmacological treatments, including inotropic agents and inhaled gases, on patient recovery. The study design prioritized comparing outcomes between pneumatic and vented electric systems to determine efficacy. This retrospective evaluation synthesized eight years of institutional experience to define the safety profile of long-term mechanical assistance.
Main Results:
Key findings from the literature indicate an overall survival rate of 73% for patients reaching either transplant or explant. The researchers supported participants for an average of 109 days during the study period. Nineteen patients successfully transitioned to outpatient care, staying home for an average of 108 days. Among those treated for postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock, 82% survived until their eventual hospital discharge. The team observed a low thromboembolic rate of 0.016 events per patient-month across the entire cohort. Most patients experiencing right ventricular failure responded well to inotropic agents and inhaled nitric oxide. Only six individuals required the placement of an additional right ventricular assist device to manage their condition. These results demonstrate that mechanical support provides a reliable bridge to further treatment while maintaining acceptable patient morbidity.
Conclusions:
The authors propose that mechanical circulatory support has successfully transitioned into a viable outpatient therapy. Their data suggest that survival rates remain excellent even when patients are managed outside the hospital. The researchers highlight that morbidity associated with these devices is currently within acceptable clinical limits. They observe that thromboembolic events remain infrequent despite the use of minimal or no anticoagulation protocols. The team suggests that wearable pump technology warrants further investigation as a permanent treatment strategy. This applies specifically to individuals who do not qualify for traditional heart transplantation procedures. The synthesis implies that long-term mechanical assistance is no longer restricted to inpatient environments. These findings provide a framework for expanding the role of mechanical support in modern cardiac care.
Frequently Asked Questions
The researchers report an overall survival rate of 73% for patients reaching either transplantation or device explant. This outcome demonstrates the effectiveness of mechanical support in bridging patients through critical periods of end-stage heart failure.
The study utilized two distinct pump types: pneumatic devices, implanted in 52 patients, and vented electric systems, provided to 32 individuals. These technologies allowed for varying degrees of mobility and long-term support during the observation period.
Right ventricular failure occurred in some patients, requiring treatment with inotropic agents and inhaled nitric oxide. Only six individuals needed additional right ventricular assist device support, indicating that most cases were managed without further invasive intervention.
Outpatient support time averaged 108 days, with a range extending from 2 to 466 days. This data point confirms the feasibility of managing patients at home while they await further cardiac interventions.
The thromboembolic rate was recorded at 0.016 events per patient-month. This low frequency occurred despite the administration of minimal or no anticoagulation, suggesting a favorable safety profile for the devices used.
The authors propose that wearable pumps should be investigated as permanent treatment options. This recommendation targets patients who are not candidates for transplantation, suggesting a shift in how end-stage heart disease is managed long-term.
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care

