Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Crossover trials with a cumulative response

S D Walter1

  • 1Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|November 14, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Estimating the rate of overdiagnosis with prostate cancer screening: evidence from the Finnish component of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

Cancer causes & control : CCC·2021
Same author

Relative efficiencies of alternative preference-based designs for randomised trials.

Statistical methods in medical research·2020
Same author

A systematic survey of randomised trials that stopped early for reasons of futility.

BMC medical research methodology·2020
Same author

Corrigendum to "Studies reporting ROC curves of diagnostic and prediction data were incorporated into meta-analyses using corresponding odds ratios" [J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 May;60(5):530-4].

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2019
Same author

Randomised trials with provision for early stopping for benefit (or harm): The impact on the estimated treatment effect.

Statistics in medicine·2019
Same author

Letter to the Editor: Preference option randomized design (PORD) for comparative effectiveness research: Statistical power for testing comparative effect, preference effect, selection effect, intent-to-treat effect, and overall effect (SMMR, Vol. 28, Issue 2, 2019).

Statistical methods in medical research·2018
Same journal

Correction.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Leveraging external controls in clinical trials: estimands, estimation, assumptions.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Special issue of nonclinical statistics in regulatory applications guest editors' notes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Comparison of flexible parametric modeling and nonparametric methods to estimate restricted mean survival time: A simulation study.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Simulated treatment comparisons with jackknife pseudo values for estimating population-adjusted marginal treatment effects.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same journal

Sample sizes for randomized controlled trials utilizing Bayesian response adaptive randomization for continuous outcomes.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
See all related articles

This study explores crossover designs for long-lasting responses in chronic disease and educational interventions. Including pretreatment data enhances cost-efficiency compared to single-period designs.

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Longitudinal Data Analysis

Background:

  • Crossover designs are suitable for chronic diseases and interventions with cumulative effects.
  • Evaluating treatment and carryover effects is crucial in these studies.
  • Long-lasting and cumulative responses require specialized modeling approaches.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop cumulative response models for two-treatment, two-period crossover designs.
  • To compare various estimators for treatment and carryover effects.
  • To assess the cost-efficiency of crossover designs with and without pretreatment observations.

Main Methods:

  • Development of cumulative response models for a two-treatment, two-period crossover design.
  • Comparison of different estimators for treatment and carryover effects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Derivation of Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) tables for model assessment.

    • Main Results:

    • The crossover design incorporating pretreatment observations is more cost-efficient than a one-period randomized design.
    • Efficiency of crossover designs without pretreatment data varies based on data reliability and study costs.
    • ANOVA tables were derived to support the analysis of treatment and carryover effects.

    Conclusions:

    • Crossover designs are effective for studying long-lasting and cumulative responses.
    • Pretreatment data significantly improves the cost-efficiency of crossover trials.
    • The choice of design efficiency depends on specific study parameters and resource allocation.