Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

When is a negative study not negative?

C Scott1, T Wasserman

  • 1Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Statistical Unit, Philadelphia, PA 19107-2914, USA.

International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
|November 22, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Imaging Results from a Direct Conversion X-ray Detector with TlBr and CMOS Pixel Array.

IEEE transactions on nuclear science·2026
Same author

TlBr Films for Direct Digital Radiography.

IEEE transactions on nuclear science·2025
Same author

Nurses' perceptions of clinical leadership in the emergency department: A qualitative descriptive study.

International emergency nursing·2025
Same author

Perioperative care of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty.

BJA education·2024
Same author

Defining remission in childhood-onset lupus: PReS-endorsed consensus definitions by an international task force.

Clinical immunology (Orlando, Fla.)·2024
Same author

The complex circumstellar environment of supernova 2023ixf.

Nature·2024
Same journal

Single Percussive Ventilation Breath-hold Imaging and Delivery in Lung Tumor Stereotactic Ablative Radiation Therapy: Initial Observations From a Prospective Clinical Trial.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

Proton beam therapy in nonmetastatic rhabdomyosarcoma: Outcome, prognostic factors and the effect of timing of radiation therapy.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

Hypofractionated Proton Reirradiation for Recurrent Glioblastoma: Clinical and Dosimetric Outcomes from a Large Single Institution Series.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

Gastrointestinal Motility-Induced Interplay in Pancreas Proton Therapy: Motion Simulation and Dosimetric Impact.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

Intra-fractional Voxel-wise Anatomical Motion Tracking Guided by Multimodal Respiratory Surrogates in Radiotherapy: Framework Development and Multi-Center Validation.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
Same journal

A Gaussian-based planning approach for robust dose-escalated stereotactic body proton therapy.

International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics·2026
See all related articles

Phase III clinical trial results are positive, null, or negative. Understanding these classifications is crucial for accurate interpretation of experimental therapy efficacy and safety compared to standard treatments.

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials
  • Medical Research Methodology
  • Evidence-Based Medicine

Background:

  • Phase III randomized clinical trials are critical for evaluating new therapies.
  • Misclassification of trial outcomes can lead to significant misinterpretations in clinical practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the definitions and implications of positive, null, and negative results in comparative clinical trials.
  • To provide examples for each category of trial outcome.

Main Methods:

  • Review and categorization of Phase III randomized clinical trial result types.
  • Analysis of the implications of each result category for therapeutic decisions.

Main Results:

  • Positive results indicate experimental therapy superiority over standard therapy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Null results signify no statistically significant difference, supporting continued use of standard therapy.
  • Negative results suggest the experimental therapy has harmful effects compared to standard therapy.

    • Conclusions:

    • Accurate classification of clinical trial outcomes is essential for evidence-based medical practice.
    • Clear understanding of positive, null, and negative results prevents misinterpretation and ensures appropriate patient care.