Related Experiment Videos

[Underreporting and follow up of exposure to blood among Danish physicians]

S Nelsing1, T L Nielsen, J O Nielsen

  • 1Infektionsmedicinsk afdeling, H:S Hvidovre Hospital.

Ugeskrift for Laeger
|February 12, 1998
PubMed

Insights

Danish doctors underreport blood exposures, with few seeking follow-up testing or vaccination. Reasons include perceived low risk and time constraints, indicating a significant gap in occupational health surveillance.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Infectious Disease Epidemiology
  • Medical Practice

Background:

  • Percutaneous (PCE) and mucocutaneous (MCE) blood exposures pose risks to healthcare professionals.
  • Underreporting of occupational blood exposures hinders accurate risk assessment and intervention.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the frequency and reasons for underreporting of PCE and MCE among Danish doctors.
  • To assess compliance with initial follow-up procedures, including serological testing and vaccination.

Main Methods:

  • Nation-wide questionnaire survey distributed to Danish doctors.
  • Analysis of reported exposures, reasons for underreporting, and follow-up actions.
  • Inclusion of 6005 valid questionnaires from 9384 doctors.

Main Results:

  • Only 3.5% of PCE and 0.4% of MCE were reported.
  • Key reasons for underreporting: 'considered unnecessary' (37.1%) and 'too time-consuming' (19.3%).
  • Low rates of follow-up: anti-HIV testing (5.0%), anti-Hbs testing (4.8%), and hepatitis B vaccination (3.7%).

Conclusions:

  • Current reporting of occupational blood exposures among Danish doctors is very low, failing to reflect the true incidence.
  • Barriers to reporting and follow-up include perceived low risk and time constraints.
  • Emphasizing the importance of serological follow-up and vaccination is crucial for improving occupational safety.

Related Concept Videos