Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

An analytic method for randomized trials with informative censoring: Part II

J M Robins1

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

Lifetime Data Analysis
|January 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces new statistical methods to accurately analyze treatment effects in clinical trials with informative censoring. These methods ensure reliable results even when patient data is incomplete due to factors related to the outcome itself.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

On the asymptotic validity of confidence sets for linear functionals of solutions to integral equations.

Biometrika·2025
Same author

Using negative controls to identify causal effects with invalid instrumental variables.

Biometrika·2025
Same author

Multiple robustness in factorized likelihood models.

Biometrika·2018
Same author

Instrumental variables as bias amplifiers with general outcome and confounding.

Biometrika·2017
Same author

Marginal Mean Models for Dynamic Regimes.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2009
Same author

Causal models for estimating the effects of weight gain on mortality.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2008

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Methodology
  • Survival Analysis

Background:

  • Informative censoring, where censoring times are related to failure times, complicates the analysis of time-to-event data in randomized trials.
  • Standard statistical methods may yield biased estimates of treatment effects when informative censoring is present.
  • Accurate assessment of treatment efficacy requires robust methods that account for non-random censoring mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop consistent and efficient semiparametric tests and estimators for treatment effects under informative censoring.
  • To provide valid statistical inference for treatment effects, even when censoring is not independent of the event.
  • To extend these methods for analyzing longitudinal repeated measures outcomes in the presence of informative censoring.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Methods:

  • Proposed a class of semiparametric tests and estimators based on specific non-identifiable assumptions for informative censoring.
  • Developed methods that extend the properties of standard weighted log-rank tests to scenarios with informative censoring.
  • Investigated the estimation of treatment effects on the evolution of repeated measures, such as CD4 counts, over time.

Main Results:

  • The proposed tests are asymptotically distribution-free alpha-level tests under the null hypothesis, even with informative censoring, given the specified assumptions.
  • These new methods offer improved validity compared to standard weighted log-rank tests in the presence of informative censoring.
  • Demonstrated the applicability of the methods to both time-to-event and longitudinal repeated measures outcomes.

Conclusions:

  • The developed semiparametric methods provide a robust framework for analyzing clinical trial data affected by informative censoring.
  • These approaches allow for reliable testing and estimation of treatment effects under challenging data conditions.
  • The study offers valuable tools for biostatisticians and researchers conducting trials where censoring may be informative.