Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Peer evaluation. A visual picture

S Dancer1, T Johnson, J Zauner

  • 1Providence Portland Medical Center, Oregon, USA.

Nursing Management
|December 31, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evidence of Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering with COHERENT's Germanium Array.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Red seaweed Chondracanthus chamissoi supplementation improved the growth performance of broiler chickens partially through effects on intestinal morphology and cecal microbiota.

Poultry science·2025
Same author

Juvenile nephropathy resembling human nephronophthisis-medullary cystic kidney disease in a 9-month-old domestic shorthaired cat.

The Journal of small animal practice·2025
Same author

Achievement of Target Gain Larger than Unity in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

Physical review letters·2024
Same author

Measurement of Electron-Neutrino Charged-Current Cross Sections on ^{127}I with the COHERENT NaIνE Detector.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Comparative assessment of radiation therapy-induced vasculitis using [<sup>18</sup>F]FDG-PET/CT in patients with non-small cell lung cancer treated with proton versus photon radiotherapy.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2023
Same journal

Uncertainty in gender-affirming care: Implications for nursing leadership and organizational practice.

Nursing management·2026
Same journal

Nurses' uncertainty in gender-affirming care: Implications for nursing leadership and organizational practice.

Nursing management·2026
Same journal

Innovativeness: A strategic necessity.

Nursing management·2026
Same journal

Improvising through ambiguity: Jazz leadership principles for nurse leaders.

Nursing management·2026
Same journal

Active listening in nursing leadership: A critical analysis.

Nursing management·2026
Same journal

Find Your Best Fit: An innovative orientation model cultivating connection and commitment in new graduate nurses.

Nursing management·2026
See all related articles

An improved peer-evaluation system provides nurses with visual performance data for professional growth. This system supports staff development and accountability without being punitive.

Area of Science:

  • Nursing
  • Healthcare Management
  • Professional Development

Background:

  • Nursing roles require accountability, competence, and continuous development.
  • Existing evaluation systems may not adequately monitor these evolving nursing roles.
  • A need exists for effective tools to support nursing staff growth.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To design an improved peer-evaluation system for monitoring nursing roles.
  • To provide a tool for continuous staff growth and development.
  • To establish role accountability and nursing competence.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a new peer-evaluation process.
  • Conversion of evaluation input into visual performance data.
  • Focus on comparative performance within peer groups.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The system offers a visual representation of individual performance relative to peers.
  • Evaluation data is generated to inform staff development.
  • The process is designed to be developmental rather than punitive.

Conclusions:

  • The improved peer-evaluation system effectively monitors nursing roles.
  • This system serves as a valuable tool for staff growth and accountability.
  • Peer evaluation can be structured to support professional development positively.