Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Encoding activity and face recognition

C Coin1, G Tiberghien

  • 1Institut de Sciences Cognitives, Lyon, France.

Memory (Hove, England)
|January 24, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Face recognition memory improves when study tasks focus on abstract traits over physical features. This research explores processing depth and holistic versus component strategies for better memory performance.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Unconscious familiarity and local context effects on low-level face processing: a reconstruction hypothesis.

Consciousness and cognition·2002
Same author

An event-related potential study of contextual modifications in a face recognition task.

Neuroreport·2001
Same author

When the smile is a cue to familiarity.

Memory (Hove, England)·2000
Same author

Phonological and semantic priming: evidence for task-independent effects.

Memory & cognition·1999
Same author

[Psychological models of the memory].

La Revue du praticien·1991
Same author

Models of human memory.

Archives of gerontology and geriatrics. Supplement·1989

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • Extensive research over 20 years investigates face recognition memory.
  • Task type significantly influences memory recall for faces.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the impact of different study tasks on face recognition memory.
  • To explore methodological factors like learning conditions and exposure duration.
  • To evaluate explanations based on processing depth and component vs. holistic processing.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing studies on face recognition memory.
  • Analysis of task variations (abstract vs. physical feature judgments).
  • Consideration of incidental vs. intentional learning and stimulus exposure duration.

Main Results:

  • Judgments about abstract traits lead to better face recognition memory than physical feature judgments.
  • Methodological variations can influence observed memory effects.

Conclusions:

  • Depth of processing and holistic processing may explain enhanced face recognition.
  • Strategies for improving face recognition performance are discussed based on these findings.

Related Experiment Videos