Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Selection of processing algorithms for digital image compression: a rank-order study

J M Holbert1, M Staiger, T S Chang

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15261-0001, USA.

Academic Radiology
|April 1, 1995
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Simulation as a set-up for technical proficiency: can a virtual warm-up improve live fibre-optic intubation?

British journal of anaesthesia·2016
Same author

The identification of an acid in the root bark of Viburnum prunifolium.

Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association. American Pharmaceutical Association·2010
Same author

A study of antacid buffers; the time factor in neutralization of gastric acidity.

Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association. American Pharmaceutical Association·2010
Same author

Sodium theophylline glycinate.

Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association. American Pharmaceutical Association·2010
Same author

Meniscal root injury and spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee: an observation.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume·2009
Same author

Repeated-batch production of kojic acid in a cell-retention fermenter using Aspergillus oryzae M3B9.

Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology·2005
Same journal

Homogeneity of Liver Fat Distribution Serves as a Diagnostic Marker for Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

MRI-based Predictors and Risk Constellations of Chronic Ankle Instability After Acute Lateral Ankle Sprain: A Multicenter Study.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Early Prediction of Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer using a Longitudinal US-based Stack-model.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Evaluating the Impact of Embolization on Outcomes in Iliopsoas Hematomas: A Multicenter Retrospective Propensity-matched Study.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Comparison of Iterative Metal Artifact Reduction Presets In Ultra-high-resolution Photon-counting CT Angiography of Patients with Total Knee Endoprosthesis.

Academic radiology·2026
Same journal

Deep Learning for Opportunistic Vertebral Fracture Detection on Routine Thoraco-abdominal Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic Meta-analysis of Patient-level Diagnostic Test Accuracy.

Academic radiology·2026
See all related articles

Non-ROC methods effectively select digital image compression algorithms by ranking image similarity. This approach identified the best algorithm, even when it didn't have the lowest quantitative error.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Imaging
  • Image Processing
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Digital image compression is crucial in medical imaging.
  • Selecting optimal processing algorithms is essential for maintaining image quality.
  • Traditional evaluation methods may not be sensitive enough for subtle differences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate non-receiver operating characteristic (non-ROC) methods for selecting digital image compression algorithms.
  • To evaluate the efficacy of non-ROC methods in identifying perceptually superior processing schemes.

Main Methods:

  • A multipoint, rank-order study was conducted using 20 posteroanterior chest images.
  • Four different image processing algorithms were applied to each image.
  • Seven radiologists ranked the similarity of processed images to the original non-compressed image.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A statistically significant difference (p = .025) was found in the radiologists' rankings.
  • One processing scheme was consistently ranked as most similar to the non-processed images.
  • The best-perceived algorithm did not yield the lowest root mean square error (RMSE).

Conclusions:

  • Non-ROC study designs are sensitive to small differences in image quality.
  • These methods can reliably select processing algorithms for digital image compression.
  • Perceptual similarity, as assessed by expert readers, is a key factor in algorithm selection.