Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 1, 2026

An Experimental Paradigm for the Prediction of Post-Operative Pain (PPOP)
Published on: January 27, 2010
Pre-emptive analgesia using local anaesthesia: a study in bilaterally symmetrical surgery
1Department of Anaesthetics, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald.
This study on lower third molar surgery found no significant pain difference whether local anesthetic was given before or after the procedure. Adequate sample size is crucial for detecting minor pain variations after surgery.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Pain Management
- Anesthesiology
Background:
- Lower third molar extraction is a common surgical procedure often associated with postoperative pain.
- Assessing and managing pain effectively after third molar surgery is crucial for patient recovery and satisfaction.
- Understanding factors influencing postoperative pain, such as anesthetic timing, can optimize surgical outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the within-patient variation in postoperative pain intensity following bilaterally symmetrical lower third molar surgery.
- To determine if administering local anesthesia before tooth removal offers superior pain relief compared to administration after removal.
- To establish the necessary sample size for detecting significant differences in pain using visual analogue scales (VAS).
Main Methods:
- Two studies were conducted on patients undergoing bilateral lower third molar surgery under general anesthesia.
- Study 1: 40 patients assessed pain using McGill pain questionnaires and VAS on the morning after surgery.
- Study 2: 38 patients compared pain between sides receiving local anesthetic before versus after extraction, using questionnaires and VAS at multiple time points.
Main Results:
- The first study indicated that a sample size over 30 is needed to detect a >10 mm VAS difference with 90% power at a 5% significance level.
- The second study found no statistically significant differences in pain between the pretreated and post-treated sides at any measured time point.
- Pain intensity, assessed via McGill pain questionnaires and VAS, showed no significant variation based on the timing of local anesthetic administration.
Conclusions:
- Postoperative pain following lower third molar surgery does not significantly differ when local anesthesia is administered before versus after extraction.
- Adequate sample sizes are essential for detecting subtle variations in pain intensity in within-patient studies.
- Current evidence suggests the timing of local anesthetic administration in this context does not impact overall pain experience.
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Local Anesthetics: Pharmacokinetics
Local Anesthetics: Common Agents and Their Applications
Cocaine is an ester of benzoic acid and methylecgogine. It is used to anesthetize and vasoconstrict locally. Currently, it is used primarily for topical applications. It is beneficial for surgeries on the upper respiratory tract, providing anesthesia and shrinking the mucosa. Cocaine in the form of cocaine hydrochloride is...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...

