Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Manual and computer-aided space analysis: a comparative study

U R Schirmer1, W A Wiltshire

  • 1Department of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Pretoria, Republic of South Africa.

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics : Official Publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, Its Constituent Societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics
|January 10, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Computer-aided space analysis using photocopies of dental models is not accurate for mesiodental measurements. Manual measurements with a calibrated gauge provide the most reliable results for orthodontic analysis.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Graduate orthodontic education in Turkey: the residents' perspective.

European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe·2013
Same author

Nickel allergy and orthodontics, a review and report of two cases.

British dental journal·2008
Same author

Diagnosis and management of the infraerupted primary molar.

British dental journal·2007
Same author

Occlusal and oral health status of a group of 3-8-year-old South African black children.

SADJ : journal of the South African Dental Association = tydskrif van die Suid-Afrikaanse Tandheelkundige Vereniging·2003
Same author

Fluoride release from new light-cured orthodontic bonding agents.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·2001
Same author

In vitro and in vivo fluoride release from orthodontic elastomeric ligature ties.

American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics·1999

Area of Science:

  • Orthodontics
  • Dental Technology
  • Biometrics

Background:

  • Computer-aided analysis of dental models offers potential for increased efficiency and data management.
  • Traditional methods of measuring dental casts are time-consuming and prone to human error.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of computer-aided space analysis compared to manual measurements.
  • To determine if photocopies of dental models can be reliably used for orthodontic measurements.

Main Methods:

  • Two investigators independently measured teeth on dental models using a Vernier gauge and a digitizer with computer processing.
  • Photocopies of dental models were created and measured to assess the impact of 2D conversion.
  • Statistical analysis, including the Wilcoxon signed rank test, was used to compare manual and digitized measurements.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Intraexaminer digitized measurements showed high agreement, but interexaminer manual and digitized measurements differed significantly for most teeth.
  • Digitized measurements of tooth width were consistently smaller than manual measurements.
  • Mean arch length differences were significant between manual and digitized analyses in both the maxilla and mandible.

Conclusions:

  • Computer-aided measurement systems are reliable for intraexaminer use but may not yield accurate mesiodental measurements from photocopies.
  • The 2D conversion of 3D dental casts introduces inaccuracies due to loss of spatial information.
  • Manual measurements using calibrated gauges remain the most accurate and reproducible method for dental space analysis.