Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Carcinogenesis models for risk assessment

A Kopp-Schneider1

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, German Cancer Research Centre, Heidelberg, Germany. kopp@dkfz-heidelberg.de

Statistical Methods in Medical Research
|February 3, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Hybrid imaging with [<sup>68</sup>Ga]PSMA-11 PET-CT and PET-MRI in biochemically recurrent prostate cancer.

Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society·2022
Same author

An R-shiny application to calculate optimal designs for single substance and interaction trials in dose response experiments.

Toxicology letters·2020
Same author

Assessment of glucose metabolism and cellular proliferation in multiple myeloma: a first report on combined <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and <sup>18</sup>F-FLT PET/CT imaging.

EJNMMI research·2018
Same author

<sup>68</sup>Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the evaluation of bone metastases in prostate cancer.

European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging·2018
Same author

Maximum intensity breast diffusion MRI for BI-RADS 4 lesions detected on X-ray mammography.

Clinical radiology·2017
Same author

Use of LDH and autoimmune side effects to predict response to ipilimumab treatment.

Immunotherapy·2016
Same journal

Modeling treatment effects on absorbing outcomes in clinical trials: Leveraging longitudinal and ordinal data for efficiency gains.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

A joint model for a longitudinal outcome and a progressive multistate model under a mixed observation scheme.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Efficient semi-supervised estimation of optimal individualized treatment regimes with survival outcome.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Asymptotic online FWER control for dependent test statistics.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Regression analysis of misclassified current status data with potentially unknown test accuracy.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
Same journal

Bayesian multivariate linear mixed-effects models with varied association structures.

Statistical methods in medical research·2026
See all related articles

This article reviews carcinogenesis models for risk assessment. Multistage models are ideal due to their biological basis, enabling explicit derivation of key metrics for statistical analysis.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Toxicology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Carcinogenesis is a complex biological process involving multiple stages.
  • Accurate risk assessment models are crucial for public health and regulatory decisions.
  • Existing models may not fully capture the biological intricacies of cancer development.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of various carcinogenesis models.
  • To discuss the application of these models in quantitative risk assessment.
  • To highlight the advantages of multistage models for cancer risk evaluation.

Main Methods:

  • Review and categorization of different carcinogenesis modeling approaches.
  • Development of mathematical methods for analyzing multistage models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Application of multistage models to derive key risk assessment parameters.

    • Main Results:

    • Multistage models offer a biologically relevant framework for understanding carcinogenesis.
    • These models allow for explicit derivation of tumor-related quantities (time, number, size).
    • Standard statistical techniques can be effectively applied to multistage model outputs.

    Conclusions:

    • Multistage models are well-suited for cancer risk assessment due to their biological basis and mathematical tractability.
    • The explicit derivation of parameters facilitates robust statistical analysis and interpretation.
    • Further application of these models can enhance the accuracy of cancer risk evaluations.