Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Laparoscopic urologic surgery outcome assessment

L G Gomella1, T A Abdel-Meguid, M A Lotfi

  • 1Department of Urology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19017-5097, USA.

Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques. Part A
|April 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Risk factors for postpartum prediabetes and type 2 diabetes in women with gestational diabetes: insights from the edugest study in Argentina.

Endocrine·2025
Same author

Breed variability in the cellular mediated immune response to experimental Neospora caninum infection in heifers.

Veterinary immunology and immunopathology·2024
Same author

Urine Extracellular Vesicle GATA2 mRNA Discriminates Biopsy Result in Men with Suspicion of Prostate Cancer.

The Journal of urology·2020
Same author

Decipher correlation patterns post prostatectomy: initial experience from 2 342 prospective patients.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2016
Same author

Efficacy of post-operative radiation in a prostatectomy cohort adjusted for clinical and genomic risk.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2016
Same author

Clinical prospects of long noncoding RNAs as novel biomarkers and therapeutic targets in prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases·2015

Laparoscopic urology surgery outcomes improved significantly with surgeon experience. Complication rates decreased from 21% to under 8% over successive study phases.

Area of Science:

  • Urology
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Surgical Outcomes

Background:

  • Laparoscopic surgery adoption in urology began in the early 1990s.
  • Continued evaluation is needed to understand its evolving utilization and outcomes.
  • Multicenter studies are crucial for assessing surgical technique advancements.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze changes in laparoscopic urologic surgery utilization.
  • To identify trends in complication rates and outcomes.
  • To evaluate short- and long-term results in a multicenter setting.

Main Methods:

  • A multicenter study assessed laparoscopic urologic procedures across three phases: retrospective (P1, before 1991), intermediate (P2, 1991-1992), and late (P3, 1993-1994).
  • The late phase (P3) included a 1-year follow-up for delayed complications.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Data collected included procedure types (laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection, varicocele ligation), complication rates, operative time, and hospital stay.

    • Main Results:

    • Total complication rates decreased progressively: 21% in P1, 16.2% in P2, and 7.98% in P3.
    • Major complication rates saw a significant reduction from 10.5% in P1 to 0.92% in P3.
    • Operative time and hospital stay also improved across the phases, with no significant long-term complications noted in P3.

    Conclusions:

    • Urologists' increasing experience with laparoscopic surgery correlates with improved outcomes and reduced complication rates.
    • The complexity of laparoscopic procedures performed has increased over time.
    • Laparoscopic urologic surgery demonstrates a continually improving safety and efficacy profile.