Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

RVU Task Force report: does it really reflect the current methods of practice?

S Abrams

    Oral Health
    |April 1, 1997
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The seroprevalence of cytomegalovirus infection in Belgium anno 2002 and 2006: a comparative analysis with hepatitis A virus seroprevalence.

    Epidemiology and infection·2019
    Same author

    Efficacy and safety of single-dose onabotulinumtoxinA in the treatment of symptoms of osteoarthritis of the knee: results of a placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

    Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2018
    Same author

    Estimating age-time-dependent malaria force of infection accounting for unobserved heterogeneity.

    Epidemiology and infection·2017
    Same author

    Assessing the risk of measles resurgence in a highly vaccinated population: Belgium anno 2013.

    Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin·2015
    Same author

    Culture conditions for induction of green plants from barley microspores by anther culture methods.

    Plant cell reports·2013
    Same author

    Acute GVHD prophylaxis with standard-dose, micro-dose or no MTX after fludarabine/melphalan conditioning.

    Bone marrow transplantation·2013
    Same journal

    Training in oral surgery.

    Oral health·2010
    Same journal

    Enamel solubilities.

    Oral health·2010
    Same journal

    Dental anaesthesia.

    Oral health·2010
    Same journal

    Dermatitis.

    Oral health·2010
    Same journal

    Stress breaking; effects of buccolingual attachments on removable partial dentures.

    Oral health·2010
    Same journal

    The broken needle.

    Oral health·2010
    See all related articles

    The Ontario Dental Association's Fee Guide update contains significant inaccuracies and anomalies, failing to reflect current dental practices. The report

    Area of Science:

    • Dental Practice Management
    • Healthcare Economics
    • Professional Fee Structures

    Background:

    • The Ontario Dental Association (ODA) commissioned a study to address anomalies in the Fee Guide and ensure it reflected current dental practices.
    • Previous Fee Guides contained inaccuracies, such as a higher responsibility rating for a simple procedure (code 14301) compared to a root canal treatment.
    • The study aimed to update the Fee Guide to align with contemporary methods in dentistry.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To revise and correct anomalies within the ODA Fee Guide.
    • To ensure the Fee Guide accurately represents current dental practice methods and time/responsibility allocations.
    • To address concerns regarding the scientific validity and accuracy of the Fee Guide's procedural data.

    Main Methods:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Direct time measurement for only 100 procedures out of 1,200.
    • Extrapolation of time values for the remaining 1,100 procedures based on the measured 100.
    • Solicitation of feedback from over 300 ODA members on the draft report.

    Main Results:

    • The report contains numerous inaccuracies and anomalies, with some procedure times potentially compromising quality of care.
    • A significant concern is the reliance on extrapolated data, which may be flawed if the initial 100 measurements are inaccurate.
    • Extensive changes were reportedly made based on member feedback, raising questions about the initial scientific basis of the report.

    Conclusions:

    • The study's objectives of creating an accurate and scientifically sound Fee Guide were not met.
    • The methodology, particularly the extrapolation of data and subsequent major revisions, undermines the report's scientific validity.
    • The ODA General Council is urged to reject the implementation of the flawed RVU Task Force report.