Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interobserver variability in pediatric radiographic quality assessment

C G Petrikowski1, H E ElBadrawy, E E Boehlau

  • 1University of Alberta, Faculty of Medicine and Oral Health Sciences.

Journal (Canadian Dental Association)
|February 25, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Treatment of cariously involved fused maxillary primary lateral and central incisors.

Pediatric dentistry·2001
Same author

Intrusion injuries of primary incisors. Part I: Review and management.

Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)·2001
Same author

Intrusion injuries of primary incisors. Part II: Sequelae affecting the intruded primary incisors.

Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)·2001
Same author

Intrusion injuries of primary incisors. Part III: Effects on the permanent successors.

Quintessence international (Berlin, Germany : 1985)·2001
Same author

Erdheim-Chester disease of the jaws: literature review and case report.

Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics·2000
Same author

Relationship of intracanal pressure with viscosity of endodontic sealer during warm Gutta-Percha vertical compaction.

Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics·2000
Same journal

Medical-Dental Integration in Community Health Centres: An Environmental Scan of British Columbia.

Journal (Canadian Dental Association)·2026
Same journal

Dental Students' Readiness to Tackle Social Determinants of Health: A Descriptive Qualitative Study.

Journal (Canadian Dental Association)·2026
Same journal

Qualifying Dental Programs for Internationally Trained Dentists: A Scoping Review.

Journal (Canadian Dental Association)·2026
Same journal

Consumers' Preferred Methods of Advertising Orthodontic Services in a Midwestern Canadian City.

Journal (Canadian Dental Association)·2026
Same journal

Validating an Oropharyngeal Cancer Risk Prediction Model with Data from a Canadian Population.

Journal (Canadian Dental Association)·2026
Same journal

The Ethical Expectations of Dentists Representing Themselves on LinkedIn.

Journal (Canadian Dental Association)·2026
See all related articles

Dental specialists showed variability in identifying radiographic errors and deciding on retakes, impacting quality assurance. Training did not eliminate this subjectivity, especially without clinical context.

Area of Science:

  • Dental radiology
  • Radiographic quality assurance

Background:

  • Quality assurance programs in Canadian provinces monitor radiographic quality.
  • Evaluation of technical radiographic errors is crucial for these programs.
  • Interobserver variability in error assessment reduces data reliability.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine interobserver variability among dental specialists in documenting radiographic technical errors.
  • To assess variability in determining the need for retakes in pediatric dental radiographs.

Main Methods:

  • Three dental specialists evaluated 200 initial pediatric radiographic surveys.
  • Observers received training and calibration to standardize error assessment.
  • Technical errors in bitewing, periapical, and panoramic radiographs were documented.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Bitewing radiograph errors were frequent, consistent with prior studies.
  • Periapical and panoramic technical errors were infrequent.
  • Significant interobserver variability was found in recording bitewing errors and ordering retakes.

Conclusions:

  • Interobserver variability in assessing radiographic technical errors persists despite training.
  • Subjectivity, particularly without clinical information, influences decisions on retakes.
  • Improving the reliability of radiographic quality assurance requires addressing this variability.