Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Informed consent: recent changes in the law

S Boyarsky

    The Journal of Urology
    |August 1, 1976
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Physicians must legally disclose procedure risks and consequences, empowering patients to make informed treatment choices. This evolving doctrine prioritizes patient autonomy over professional judgment, reflecting a significant shift in medical law.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Forensic urology: a practical vision.

    Medicine and law·1998
    Same author

    Formative years of the Urodynamics Society: reminiscences.

    Neurourology and urodynamics·1998
    Same author

    Testicular torsion: pitfalls of color Doppler sonography.

    The Journal of urology·1993
    Same author

    Thanatology: a new clinical specialty to help confront death.

    Missouri medicine·1992
    Same author

    "Let's kill all the lawyers": what did Shakespeare mean?

    The Journal of legal medicine·1991
    Same author

    Medicolegal aspects of testicular torsion.

    Missouri medicine·1990

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Law
    • Bioethics
    • Patient Rights

    Background:

    • Physicians traditionally held a paternalistic approach to patient care.
    • Legal precedents are shifting towards greater patient autonomy in medical decision-making.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To analyze the legal evolution of physician disclosure duties.
    • To examine the standard for adequate informed consent.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of legal doctrines and case law regarding informed consent.
    • Analysis of judicial decisions establishing physician disclosure requirements.

    Main Results:

    • Physician's legal duty to disclose all risks and consequences of a proposed procedure is a reversal of previous legal doctrine.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Adequate disclosure requires providing patients sufficient information to make autonomous treatment decisions.
  • The criterion for sufficiency is the relevance of disclosure, not its completeness.

    • Conclusions:

    • The legal standard has moved away from 'doctor knows best' towards patient-centered decision-making.
    • Informed consent doctrine signifies a broader societal shift towards patient empowerment.
    • This trend is expected to continue, further solidifying patient rights in healthcare.