Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Screening for gestational diabetes: who? How?]

V Lejeune1, J Milliez

  • 1Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Paris.

Journal De Gynecologie, Obstetrique Et Biologie De La Reproduction
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[After the COVID crisis, what solutions for the future nursing home?]

Bulletin de l'Academie nationale de medecine·2022
Same author

The effect of tranexamic acid on blood loss in orthognathic surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled, equivalence study.

International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery·2021
Same author

[Definition of pregnancy losses: Standardization of terminology from the French National College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (CNGOF)].

Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction·2014
Same author

[Psychology and pregnancy loss].

Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction·2014
Same author

Evaluation of pulse pressure variation validity criteria in critically ill patients: a prospective observational multicentre point-prevalence study.

British journal of anaesthesia·2013
Same author

[Recurrent spontaneous miscarriage: etiology, and management of subsequent pregnancies].

Journal de gynecologie, obstetrique et biologie de la reproduction·2010

Universal screening for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is recommended, as risk factors are unreliable indicators. Current screening methods and their effectiveness in reducing complications remain debated, necessitating further research.

Area of Science:

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Endocrinology
  • Public Health

Context:

  • Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) diagnosis lacks international consensus.
  • Current screening protocols often target only high-risk pregnancies.
  • Risk factors for GDM are present in only 30-45% of cases, with complications occurring regardless of risk status.

Purpose:

  • To highlight the controversy surrounding gestational diabetes mellitus screening and diagnosis.
  • To advocate for universal screening due to the limitations of risk-factor-based approaches.
  • To discuss the challenges and ethical considerations in evaluating screening and treatment efficacy.

Summary:

  • There is no global agreement on gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening, leading to inconsistent practices.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Complications of GDM occur frequently, irrespective of maternal risk factors, suggesting universal screening may be necessary.
  • The optimal screening test and diagnostic cut-offs are debated, with the WHO's proposed test requiring further validation for late-term pregnancy.

    • Impact:

    • Universal screening for GDM could improve early detection and management, potentially reducing maternal and infant complications.
    • Further research, including ethically sound prospective studies, is required to definitively establish the benefits of GDM screening and treatment.
    • Clarifying screening protocols and diagnostic criteria for GDM is crucial for standardizing prenatal care and improving pregnancy outcomes.