Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Age, relationship, and touch initiation

F N Willis1, R A Dodds

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Missouri at Kansas City 64110-2499, USA.

The Journal of Social Psychology
|March 28, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A potent small molecule, nonpeptide inhibitor of cathepsin K (SB 331750) prevents bone matrix resorption in the ovariectomized rat.

Bone·2002
Same author

Identification and initial characterization of 5000 expressed sequenced tags (ESTs) each from adult human normal and osteoarthritic cartilage cDNA libraries.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2001
Same author

Azepanone-based inhibitors of human and rat cathepsin K.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2001
Same author

Human osteoclast cathepsin K is processed intracellularly prior to attachment and bone resorption.

Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research·2001
Same author

Biosynthesis and processing of cathepsin K in cultured human osteoclasts.

Bone·2001
Same author

Attribute centrality and imaginative thought.

Memory & cognition·2001
Same journal

War and Terrorism Perceptions a Decade Later: Target Distinction or Ethnic-Cultural Bias?

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

You Must Eat Less Meat! Effects of Issue Importance on Reactance to Meat-Reduction Messages.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

The Dynamics of Distributed Leadership and Organizational Citizenship Behavior in Healthcare: Moderated Mediation of Psychological Capital and Emotional Exhaustion.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

Threat-Induced Conservatism in a Liberal Electorate: Issue-Based Shifts without Ideological Transformation.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

Exploring schadenfreude from the perspectives of deservingness and terror management theories.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
Same journal

The Impact of Shame, Humiliation and Pride on Revenge Desire and Behavior in Victims of Crime: A Pilot Experimental Study.

The Journal of social psychology·2026
See all related articles

This study on touch in couples found that age and relationship status predict who initiates touch. Women reported higher agreement than men, aligning with evolutionary psychology theories.

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Evolutionary Psychology
  • Human Behavior

Background:

  • Previous research indicates gender asymmetry in touch is linked to participant age and relationship dynamics.
  • Understanding touch initiation provides insights into relationship quality and social interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the influence of age and relationship factors on gendered touch initiation in couples.
  • To explore the relationship between couples' agreement levels and touch initiation patterns.
  • To evaluate findings against evolutionary models of sex differences in reproductive strategies.

Main Methods:

  • Observational study of couples in public settings, recording touch occurrences, initiators, and body areas.
  • Post-observation questionnaires collected data on participant age, relationship type, and agreement levels.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Statistical analysis to determine predictors of touch initiation gender.
  • Main Results:

    • Participant age and relationship status significantly predicted the gender of the touch initiator.
    • Levels of agreement were less predictive of touch initiation compared to age and relationship.
    • Women reported higher levels of agreement within couples than men did.

    Conclusions:

    • Findings support a model where age and relationship context influence gendered touch dynamics.
    • Discrepancies in reported agreement between genders may reflect differing social or evolutionary strategies.
    • The study contributes to understanding nonverbal communication and relationship dynamics in heterosexual couples.