Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Prospective remembering: perceptually driven or conceptually driven processes?

M A McDaniel1, B Robinson-Riegler, G O Einstein

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque 87131, USA. mcdaniel@unm.edu

Memory & Cognition
|March 31, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effects of simultaneous interference upon free recall learning and retention.

Memory & cognition·2011
Same author

What is minimal about predictive inferences?

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2002
Same author

Many-to-one and one-to-many associative learning in a naturalistic task.

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2001
Same author

Use of situational judgment tests to predict job performance: a clarification of the literature.

The Journal of applied psychology·2001
Same author

Varying the importance of a prospective memory task: differential effects across time- and event-based prospective memory.

Memory (Hove, England)·2001
Same author

The stability of validity coefficients over time: Ackerman's (1988) model and the general aptitude test battery.

The Journal of applied psychology·2001
Same journal

Limited protective effects of multilingualism against age-related cognitive decline.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Validation of illustrated texts: Can pictures raise awareness of inconsistencies?

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

4I remember (and forget) your happy smiling face: Directed forgetting of emotionally expressive faces of in-group and out-group members.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Identity in the spotlight: Matching faces without overlapping features.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

Test delay and change awareness moderate retroactive and proactive memory effects.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same journal

The Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) illusion in short-term memory: Opposite effects of retention interval on true and false recognition.

Memory & cognition·2026
See all related articles

Prospective memory, the ability to remember future intentions, is primarily driven by conceptual processes, not just data retrieval. This research highlights the importance of semantic context and attention in successful prospective remembering.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Memory Research

Background:

  • Prospective memory involves remembering to perform an intended action in the future.
  • Understanding the cognitive processes underlying prospective memory is crucial for explaining memory function.
  • Previous research has explored various factors influencing prospective memory, but the balance between data-driven and conceptually driven processes requires further clarification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether prospective remembering relies more on data-driven or conceptually driven cognitive processes.
  • To examine the impact of semantic context changes, stimulus modality, and encoding type on prospective memory performance.
  • To determine the role of divided attention during retrieval on prospective memory accuracy.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Three experiments were conducted using prospective memory tasks where participants had to perform an action upon encountering a target item.
  • Semantic context was manipulated between encoding and retrieval phases.
  • Stimulus modality (word vs. picture) and encoding type (semantic vs. nonsemantic) were varied.
  • Attention was divided during retrieval in one experiment.

Main Results:

  • Prospective memory performance significantly declined when the semantic context changed from encoding to retrieval.
  • Presenting target events as words versus pictures, and nonsemantic versus semantic encoding, also led to decreased prospective memory.
  • Dividing attention during retrieval substantially impaired prospective memory performance.
  • The findings indicate that prospective memory is predominantly conceptually driven.

Conclusions:

  • Prospective memory, as studied here, is largely supported by conceptually driven processes.
  • Its performance pattern aligns more closely with direct than indirect conceptual memory tests.
  • The results suggest that prospective remembering is mediated by a reflexive episodic associative memory system.