Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Data management in olfaction studies

M Chastrette1

  • 1Laboratoire de Chimie Organique Physique, UMR 5622-CNRS, Université Lyon I, Villeurbanne, France.

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research
|April 2, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Molecular complexity determines the number of olfactory notes and the pleasantness of smells.

Scientific reports·2012
Same author

Modelling the human olfactory stimulus-response function.

Chemical senses·1998
Same author

Trends in structure-odor relationships.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·1997
Same author

Structure-odor relationships: using neural networks in the estimation of camphoraceous or fruity odors and olfactory thresholds of aliphatic alcohols.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·1996
Same author

A nonlinear map of substituent constants for selecting test series and deriving structure-activity relationships. 1. Aromatic series.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·1994
Same author

A nonlinear map of substituent constants for selecting test series and deriving structure-activity relationships. 2. Aliphatic series.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·1994
Same journal

Mapping toxicity pathways of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances using interpretable classification-based machine learning models.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026
Same journal

Structure-based identification of inhibitory compounds targeting M32 metallocarboxypeptidase of <i>Leishmania donovani</i>.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026
Same journal

Multiscale computational evaluation of marine fungal metabolites containing iminohydantoin-like scaffolds as anti-Alzheimer drug candidates.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026
Same journal

Conformational landscapes and binding free energies of multitarget phytochemicals reveal molecular recognition mechanisms in colorectal cancer-associated proteins.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026
Same journal

AI-driven QSAR modelling and virtual screening in the discovery of selective dopamine D<sub>2</sub> receptor ligands.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026
Same journal

Integrating machine learning and pharmacogenomics for biomarker discovery, identification and prioritization of potential drug candidates in ovarian cancer.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026
See all related articles

Collecting olfactory data is challenging due to individual perception, measurement methods, and psychological factors. Standardizing odor intensity data is crucial for structure-odor relationship studies.

Area of Science:

  • Sensory Science
  • Chemosensation Research
  • Olfactory Science

Background:

  • Olfactory data collection is complex due to the subjective nature of odor perception and description.
  • Individual physiological and psychological factors significantly influence olfactory measurements.
  • Variability in odor intensity data, often threshold data, hinders correlation with physicochemical properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss challenges in collecting olfactory data.
  • To review existing odor classification methods for structure-odor relationships.
  • To examine odor intensity data and standardization efforts.

Main Methods:

  • Discussion of empirical, semi-empirical, and statistical approaches to odor classification.
  • Analysis of data collection methods including semantic descriptions, profiles, and similarity estimations.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of olfactory threshold data and standardization attempts.

    • Main Results:

    • Olfactory data collection is highly variable, influenced by individual differences and methodology.
    • Various odor classification systems exist, based on different analytical approaches.
    • Odor intensity data, particularly thresholds, exhibit significant variability, complicating structure-odor relationship analyses.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardization of olfactory data collection and classification is essential for advancing structure-odor relationship studies.
    • Addressing individual variability and methodological inconsistencies is key to reliable olfactory research.
    • Further efforts are needed to standardize odor intensity measurements and their relation to chemical properties.