Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Trends in structure-odor relationships

¹Université Claude Bernard Lyon I-LCOPS-43, Villeurbanne, France.

SAR and QSAR in Environmental Research

|January 1, 1997

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Molecular complexity determines the number of olfactory notes and the pleasantness of smells.

Scientific reports·2012

Same author

Modelling the human olfactory stimulus-response function.

Chemical senses·1998

Same author

Data management in olfaction studies.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·1998

Same author

Structure-odor relationships: using neural networks in the estimation of camphoraceous or fruity odors and olfactory thresholds of aliphatic alcohols.

Journal of chemical information and computer sciences·1996

Same author

A nonlinear map of substituent constants for selecting test series and deriving structure-activity relationships. 1. Aromatic series.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·1994

Same author

A nonlinear map of substituent constants for selecting test series and deriving structure-activity relationships. 2. Aliphatic series.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·1994

Same journal

Mapping toxicity pathways of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances using interpretable classification-based machine learning models.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026

Same journal

Structure-based identification of inhibitory compounds targeting M32 metallocarboxypeptidase of <i>Leishmania donovani</i>.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026

Same journal

Multiscale computational evaluation of marine fungal metabolites containing iminohydantoin-like scaffolds as anti-Alzheimer drug candidates.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026

Same journal

Conformational landscapes and binding free energies of multitarget phytochemicals reveal molecular recognition mechanisms in colorectal cancer-associated proteins.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026

Same journal

AI-driven QSAR modelling and virtual screening in the discovery of selective dopamine D<sub>2</sub> receptor ligands.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026

Same journal

Integrating machine learning and pharmacogenomics for biomarker discovery, identification and prioritization of potential drug candidates in ovarian cancer.

SAR and QSAR in environmental research·2026

See all related articles

This study analyzes structure-odor relationships, examining how molecular structure influences perceived odor intensity and quality. Key trends in this scientific field were identified through statistical analysis of various datasets.

Area of Science:

Chemistry
Sensory Science
Computational Chemistry

Background:

Understanding the relationship between a molecule's structure and its perceived odor is crucial in fields like perfumery, food science, and toxicology.
Previous research has explored various aspects of structure-odor relationships, but a comprehensive analysis of trends is often lacking.

Purpose of the Study:

To analyze and discuss structure-odor relationships concerning odor intensity and odor quality.
To identify principal trends in the field of structure-odor relationships.
To evaluate the methodologies and datasets used in structure-odor relationship studies.

Main Methods:

Statistical analysis of existing datasets on chemical structures and their associated odor properties.
Review and discussion of various structure-odor relationship models and their effectiveness.

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative analysis of different statistical approaches employed in the field.

Main Results:

Identification of key structural features that correlate with specific odor characteristics (e.g., intensity, quality).
Analysis of the predictive power of different models based on the datasets used.
Discussion of the limitations and strengths of current structure-odor relationship methodologies.

Conclusions:

Significant trends in structure-odor relationships have been identified, providing a foundation for future research.
The study highlights the importance of robust statistical methods and comprehensive datasets for advancing the field.
Further investigation into quantitative structure-odor relationships (QSOR) is warranted to improve predictive accuracy.