Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The linear no-threshold response: why not linearity?

W K Sinclair1

  • 1National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, Bethesda, Maryland 20814, USA.

Medical Physics
|April 21, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

X-ray sensitivity during the cell generation cycle of cultured Chinese hamster cells. 1966.

Radiation research·2012
Same author

Risks of fatal cancer from inhalation of 239,240plutonium by humans: a combined four-method approach with uncertainty evaluation.

Health physics·2001
Same author

Dose limits for astronauts.

Health physics·2000
Same author

Merril Eisenbud (1915-1997).

Radiation research·1997
Same author

The present system of quantities and units for radiation protection.

Health physics·1996
Same author

Low dose: reply.

Health physics·1995
Same journal

Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

Medical physics·2026
Same journal

Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

Medical physics·2026
See all related articles

Radiation protection guidelines use risk coefficients based on a linear quadratic response, acknowledging uncertainties and low-dose effects. This model supports common-sense judgments for dismissing minor radiation risks.

Area of Science:

  • Radiation Protection Science
  • Radiobiology
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) and National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) recommend risk coefficients for radiation protection.
  • These coefficients are based on a linear quadratic (LQ) dose-response model, accounting for low dose and dose rate effects, derived from the A-bomb survivor Lifespan Study and other epidemiological data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the suitability of the linear quadratic (LQ) dose-response model in the low-dose region for radiation protection.
  • To consider the uncertainties in risk coefficients and the implications of adaptive responses.
  • To explore the application of common-sense judgments in dismissing minor radiation risks.

Main Methods:

  • Review of existing epidemiological studies, including occupational exposures at low doses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of laboratory studies investigating dose-response relationships at low doses (e.g., down to 2.5 mGy).
  • Consideration of proposed frameworks for negligible individual risk and individual dose limits.

    • Main Results:

    • Epidemiological studies show significant excess risks at doses as low as 100 mGy or even 10 mGy.
    • Laboratory studies indicate linearity in some biological systems down to 2.5 mGy.
    • Risk coefficients derived from the A-bomb survivor study have uncertainties (2-3 fold range).

    Conclusions:

    • The linear quadratic (LQ) response appears to be the most likely model for radiation effects in the very low dose region.
    • The LQ model does not preclude the use of common-sense judgments to dismiss small radiation risks.
    • Further consideration of dismissing minor risks in practical radiation protection is warranted, aligning with NCRP's definitions of negligible risk.