Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Modulation detection by normal and hearing-impaired listeners

S Lacher-Fougère1, L Demany

  • 1Laboratoire d'Audiologie Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Bordeaux 2, France.

Audiology : Official Organ of the International Society of Audiology
|April 21, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

[Results of alginate and hypertonic solution in wound healing of head and neck cancers].

Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie·2009
Same author

Temporal pitch perception and the binaural system.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2001
Same author

[Facial paralysis: treatment with an acyclovir-methylprednisolone combination, preliminary results].

Revue de laryngologie - otologie - rhinologie·2000
Same author

Memory for pitch versus memory for loudness.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
Same author

Psychophysical evidence against the autocorrelation theory of auditory temporal processing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999
Same author

Temporal dynamics of pitch strength in regular interval noises.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·1999

Hearing-impaired individuals show poorer frequency modulation (FM) detection, especially with significant hearing loss. Cochlear damage equally impairs the neural phase-locking and tonotopic cues used for FM sound detection.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Neuroscience
  • Speech and Hearing Science

Background:

  • Auditory perception relies on processing frequency modulation (FM) and amplitude modulation (AM) cues.
  • Cochlear damage can significantly impact the ability to detect these modulations.
  • Understanding how different auditory cues are affected by hearing loss is crucial for rehabilitation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the detection thresholds of frequency modulation (FM) and amplitude modulation (AM) in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
  • To investigate the impact of cochlear damage on the use of neural phase-locking and tonotopic cues for FM detection.

Main Methods:

  • Detection thresholds for 1-second sinusoidal FM and AM stimuli (500 Hz carrier frequency) were measured in 5 normally hearing and 7 hearing-impaired subjects.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Stimuli were presented at comfortable loudness levels.
  • Two modulation frequencies (Fmod) were tested: 2 Hz and 10 Hz.

    • Main Results:

    • Hearing-impaired subjects exhibited poorer FM detection compared to normally hearing subjects, particularly when hearing loss exceeded 50 dB at the carrier frequency.
    • Amplitude modulation (AM) detection was not significantly different between the groups.
    • The detrimental effect of cochlear damage on FM detection was similar for both low (2 Hz) and high (10 Hz) modulation frequencies, suggesting an equal reduction in the usefulness of neural phase-locking and tonotopic cues.

    Conclusions:

    • Cochlear damage impairs frequency modulation (FM) detection, with the degree of impairment related to the severity of hearing loss.
    • The findings suggest that cochlear damage equally diminishes the effectiveness of both neural phase-locking and tonotopic processing, which are critical for normal FM sound perception.