Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Similarity as an explanatory construct

S A Sloman1, L J Rips

  • 1Department of Cognitive and Linguistic Sciences, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA. Steven_Sloman@brown.edu

Cognition
|April 29, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Necessity and natural categories.

Psychological bulletin·2001
Same author

Two kinds of reasoning.

Psychological science·2001
Same author

Reasoning versus text processing in the Wason selection task: a nondeontic perspective on perspective effects.

Memory & cognition·2000
Same author

Perspective effects in nondeontic versions of the Wason selection task.

Memory & cognition·2000
Same author

Feature centrality: naming versus imagining.

Memory & cognition·1999
Same author

A year's memories: the calendar effect in autobiographical recall.

Memory & cognition·1998
Same journal

When criterion control in face matching induces correlation: Commentary on Baker et al. (2026).

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to "Productivity matters for the neural processing of novel words, but not existing ones" Cognition Volume 274 (2026) 106593.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Investigating the origins of partisanship: What motivates children to preferentially endorse their ingroups' claims?

Cognition·2026
Same journal

People make graded judgments about the inconceivable.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

The self as an image: Appearance and belief in visual representations of one's own face.

Cognition·2026
Same journal

Corrigendum to 'Consonant, vowel, and tone cues in early wordform recognition: Evidence from Cantonese-learning infants' [Cognition 275 (2026) 106624].

Cognition·2026
See all related articles

Cognitive science explores how similarity and abstract rules shape thought. An effective model of human cognition requires integrating both flexible similarity-based reasoning and precise rule-based inference.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Psychology
  • Computational Modeling

Background:

  • Cognitive science theories often employ similarity or abstract rules to explain thought processes.
  • A debate exists regarding the primary mechanisms underlying human cognition: similarity-based versus rule-based models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To delineate the various explanatory roles of similarity in cognitive theories.
  • To compare the computational advantages and disadvantages of similarity-based and rule-based cognitive models.
  • To review empirical evidence supporting the psychological plausibility of each framework.

Main Methods:

  • Theoretical analysis of similarity's explanatory roles.
  • Computational comparison of similarity and rule-based models.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Review of empirical psychological studies.

    • Main Results:

    • Four distinct explanatory roles for similarity were identified.
    • Similarity-based models offer flexibility, while rule-based models provide compositionality and certainty.
    • Empirical evidence supports the psychological relevance of both approaches.

    Conclusions:

    • Human cognition is not exclusively driven by either similarity or rules.
    • An adequate cognitive model must synthesize the strengths of both similarity-based and rule-based inference.
    • Integrating flexible similarity with compositional rules is key to understanding human thought.