Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Satisfaction with care: do Medicare HMOs make a difference?

C G Tudor1, G Riley, M Ingber

  • 1Health Care Financing Administration, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Health Affairs (Project Hope)
|April 29, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measurement of single-diffractive dijet production in proton-proton collisions at <math> </math> with the CMS and TOTEM experiments.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2020
Same author

Studies of Charm Quark Diffusion inside Jets Using Pb-Pb and pp Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02  TeV.

Physical review letters·2020
Same author

Study of central exclusive production in proton-proton collisions at <math> </math> and 13TeV.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2020
Same author

Measurement of differential cross sections and charge ratios for <i>t</i>-channel single top quark production in proton-proton collisions at <math> </math> <math></math>.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2020
Same author

Mixed higher-order anisotropic flow and nonlinear response coefficients of charged particles in <math></math> collisions at <math> </math> and 5.02 <math></math>.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2020
Same author

Search for direct pair production of supersymmetric partners to the <math></math> lepton in proton-proton collisions at <math> </math>.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2020
Same journal

National Health Expenditure Projections, 2025-34: Strong Utilization Growth Initially, Legislative Impacts Later.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

State Medicaid Programs Face Increased Spending On Medicare Premiums.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

Not enough time.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

Medicaid Tobacco And Nicotine Cessation Treatment Rates Remained Low, 2019-24.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

Third-Party Convener Firms And The Rise Of Geographically Dispersed, High-Earning Medicare ACOs.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
Same journal

The Opacity Of Price Transparency.

Health affairs (Project Hope)·2026
See all related articles

Medicare beneficiaries in health maintenance organizations (HMOs) reported higher satisfaction with care costs and convenience. However, those in fee-for-service (FFS) plans reported better doctor-patient interactions.

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Health Economics
  • Medical Sociology

Background:

  • Medicare beneficiaries are a significant population with diverse healthcare needs.
  • Understanding satisfaction with different healthcare delivery models is crucial for policy and patient care.
  • Health Maintenance Organizations (HMOs) and Fee-For-Service (FFS) represent distinct healthcare systems impacting patient experience.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare satisfaction with care and doctor-patient interactions among Medicare beneficiaries in HMOs versus FFS.
  • To identify specific areas of satisfaction and dissatisfaction within each healthcare model.

Main Methods:

  • Comparative analysis of Medicare beneficiaries enrolled in HMOs and those in the FFS sector (nonenrollees).
  • Statistical control for relevant covariates to isolate the impact of healthcare plan type.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessment of satisfaction levels concerning overall care, costs, care coordination, and physician interaction quality.

    • Main Results:

    • Overall satisfaction with care was comparable between HMO enrollees and FFS nonenrollees after controlling for covariates.
    • HMO enrollees reported significantly higher satisfaction with care costs and the convenience of receiving care at a single location.
    • FFS nonenrollees reported higher satisfaction with the quality of interaction with their physicians across all measured components.

    Conclusions:

    • Medicare beneficiaries' satisfaction varies based on healthcare delivery model, with trade-offs between cost/convenience and physician interaction quality.
    • HMOs offer advantages in cost and care coordination, while FFS may provide superior physician relationship experiences.
    • These findings have implications for Medicare policy and healthcare provider strategies aimed at optimizing patient satisfaction.