A randomized comparison of acute phase response and endotoxemia in patients with perforated peptic ulcers receiving...

In patients with peritonitis from perforated peptic ulcers, we compared acute stress responses, endotoxemia, and bacteremia following laparoscopic or open surgery.

Consecutive patients with peritonitis from perforated peptic ulcers were randomized to receive laparoscopic sutured or open omental repair. Undiluted peritoneal fluid was obtained at surgery for quantitative bacterial and endotoxin (Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate) assay. Serial blood samples were taken at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 180 minutes, and at 12, 24, 48, 72, and 120 hours for determinations of quantitative bacterial and endotoxin assays, interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), and cortisol.

Twenty-two patients were randomized: laparoscopy group (n = 12), open repair group (n = 10). Conversions were required in 3 patients assigned to laparoscopy, leaving 9 patients for analysis. The two groups were comparable in their demographic data, median duration of perforation (13.5 hours versus 10 hours), severity of peritoneal contamination as indicated by viable bacterial count (5.9 x 102 versus 1.5 x 10(2) colony forming unit/mL) and endotoxin concentration in peritoneal fluid (27.2 versus 24.6 EU/mL). No significant endotoxemia or bacteremia was detected in these patients. Median interleukin-6 was highest at 0 hour (1520 versus 962 pg/mL) and fell rapidly following surgery. C-reactive protein peaked at 24 hours and plateaued thereafter. Cortisol was highest intraoperatively and fell thereafter. No difference was noted between the two treatment groups with respect to these inflammatory markers (IL-6 P = 0.19, CRP P = 0.14, cortisol P = 0.56, multivariate analysis of variance).

Endotoxemia and bacteremia are insignificant in most patients with perforated peptic ulcers. In patients with perforated peptic ulcers, laparoscopic patch repair does not reduce acute stress responses when compared with open surgery.