Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A multiperspective, multivariable evaluation of reliable change

K M Lunnen1, B M Ogles

  • 1Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens 45701, USA.

Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
|May 16, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical significance: history, application, and current practice.

Clinical psychology review·2001
Same author

Managed care as a platform for cross-system integration.

The journal of behavioral health services & research·1998
Same author

Computerized depression screening and awareness.

Community mental health journal·1998
Same author

Satisfaction ratings: meaningful or meaningless?

Behavioral healthcare tomorrow·1997
Same author

Clinical significance of the National Institute of Mental Health Treatment of Depression Collaborative Research Program data.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·1995
Same author

Psychological consequences of athletic injury among high-level competitors.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·1994
Same journal

(Computation of) the standardized mean difference in clinical trials should be standardized.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·2026
Same journal

Efficacy of a modified digital unified protocol targeting both positive and negative emotion regulation: A randomized clinical trial.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·2026
Same journal

Perceived changes in drinking are a mechanism of spillover effects from a brief alcohol intervention conducted in a college social network.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·2026
Same journal

Online versus telehealth delivery of a parenting program for postdeployed military families: Child internalizing and externalizing symptoms as moderators of response.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·2026
Same journal

Testing self-help interventions for adults with clinical perfectionism: A randomized controlled trial comparing online skills modules to a book.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·2026
Same journal

Testing child STEPS in school-based mental health care: Cluster-randomized controlled effectiveness trial in five school districts.

Journal of consulting and clinical psychology·2026
See all related articles

The reliable change index (RCI) effectively identifies therapy improvement but struggles to distinguish between clients who do not change and those who deteriorate. This impacts understanding client outcomes and satisfaction.

Area of Science:

  • Psychotherapy outcome research
  • Clinical psychology
  • Treatment effectiveness evaluation

Background:

  • The Jacobson and Truax (1991) reliable change index (RCI) is a prominent method for assessing clinical significance in psychotherapy.
  • Limited research has validated the RCI's effectiveness in real-world therapeutic settings.
  • Understanding client change and satisfaction is crucial for improving mental health services.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the validity of the reliable change index (RCI) in psychotherapy outcome research.
  • To compare subjective client change perceptions across RCI-defined outcome groups.
  • To examine the relationship between therapeutic alliance, client satisfaction, and RCI-based outcomes.

Main Methods:

  • Compared subjective change reports from three perspectives across outcome groups defined by the RCI.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed subjective reports of therapeutic alliance and client satisfaction across these outcome groupings.
  • Utilized statistical comparisons to evaluate the RCI's differentiation capabilities.

    • Main Results:

    • The RCI effectively identified clients who showed reliable improvement in therapy.
    • The RCI was less effective in differentiating between clients who showed no change and those who deteriorated.
    • The study questioned the direct relationship between treatment outcome and client satisfaction with services.

    Conclusions:

    • The reliable change index (RCI) is a useful tool for identifying therapeutic gains but has limitations in classifying non-improvers.
    • Further research is needed to refine outcome measures and understand the nuances of client satisfaction.
    • Clinical significance assessment in psychotherapy requires careful consideration of multiple outcome indicators.