Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Is there a difference in incision healing based on location?

P Ernest1, R Tipperman, R Eagle

  • 1Eye Care Physicians of Michigan, Jackson, USA.

Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery
|May 19, 1998
PubMed
Summary

Limbal incisions heal faster than clear corneal incisions due to a quicker fibroblastic response, enhancing stability. This study compared healing times for vascular (limbal) versus avascular (corneal) incision sites.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Our specialty. The future. Is the writing on the wall?

The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery·2020
Same author

[How I explore ... a risk difference in the occurrence of an event in clinical trials].

Revue medicale de Liege·2013
Same author

The utility of molecular diagnostics to predict recurrence of head and neck carcinoma.

British journal of cancer·2012
Same author

[Renal SGLT2 inhibitors, new agents for the management of type 2 diabetes].

Revue medicale suisse·2011
Same author

[Therapy of type 2 diabetes: between insulin sensitizers and insulin secreting agents].

Revue medicale de Liege·2008
Same author

Self-management in bronchiectasis: the patients' perspective.

The European respiratory journal·2006

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Surgical Wound Healing
  • Tissue Regeneration

Background:

  • Surgical incision location significantly impacts wound healing and ocular tissue stability.
  • Understanding the differential healing responses of vascularized versus avascular ocular tissues is crucial for optimizing surgical outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the healing processes of surgical incisions originating in avascular (corneal) versus vascular (limbal) regions of the eye.
  • To evaluate the factors influencing ocular incision stability and healing rates based on anatomical location.

Main Methods:

  • Feline eyes underwent surgical evaluations with incisions placed in either avascular (clear corneal) or vascular (limbal) locations.
  • Postoperative assessments included slit-lamp examinations, external pressure measurements, incision stability tests, and histological analysis.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of tissue response and healing timelines between the two incision groups.

    • Main Results:

    • All limbal incisions demonstrated stability within 7 days post-surgery.
    • Histological analysis revealed an earlier fibroblastic response in limbal incisions compared to a delayed response in clear corneal incisions.
    • Clear corneal incisions required approximately 60 days for healing.

    Conclusions:

    • Incision geometry, architecture, and location are primary determinants of healing and stability.
    • Vascularized limbal incisions promote a fibroblastic response, leading to enhanced stability and rapid healing within 7 days.
    • Avascular corneal incisions exhibit delayed healing, requiring significantly longer recovery periods.