Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Choosing reconstruction after mastectomy: a qualitative analysis

K M Neill1, N Armstrong, C B Burnett

  • 1Lombardi Cancer Center, Georgetown University Medical Center School of Nursing, Washington, DC, USA.

Oncology Nursing Forum
|May 26, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Iodine or Not for Low-risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: How Should We Implement the Findings into UK Practice? An Expert Consensus Opinion.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2025
Same author

Patient Preparation and Radiation Protection Guidance for Adult Patients Undergoing Radioiodine Treatment for Thyroid Cancer in the UK.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2022
Same author

<i>Virgibacillus doumboii</i> sp. nov., a halophilic bacterium isolated from the stool of a healthy child in Mali.

New microbes and new infections·2021
Same author

Taxonogenomics description of <i>Arcanobacterium urinimassiliense</i> sp. nov., a new bacterial species isolated from urine sample.

New microbes and new infections·2021
Same author

<i>Luxibacter massiliensis</i> gen. nov., sp. nov., a new bacterium isolated from the human gut microbiota.

New microbes and new infections·2021
Same author

Description of <i>Gracilibacillus phocaeensis</i> sp. nov., a new halophilic bacterium isolated from Senegalian human stool.

New microbes and new infections·2020
Same journal

Exploring Information Needs of Patients With Cancer and Family Caregivers: A Descriptive and Network Analysis of End-of-Life Inquiries.

Oncology nursing forum·2026
Same journal

Postoperative Physiologic Comfort Management for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Hepatic Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy.

Oncology nursing forum·2026
Same journal

Exploring Racial Disparities in Uterine Cancer Survival: A 20-Year, Single-Site Analysis.

Oncology nursing forum·2026
Same journal

What I See as an Editor: The Reach of Nurse-Led Intervention Oncology Research.

Oncology nursing forum·2026
Same journal

Trends and Hot Spots in Cancer Family Resilience: A Bibliometric and Visualization Study.

Oncology nursing forum·2026
Same journal

Seven-Year Cognitive Trajectories in Older Adult Cancer Survivors: Findings From a National Cohort Study.

Oncology nursing forum·2026
See all related articles

Women undergoing breast cancer reconstruction sought to regain normalcy, influenced by healthcare providers and social support. The decision-making process involved information seeking and discussion to achieve personal life goals post-treatment.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Surgical Oncology
  • Psychosocial Oncology

Background:

  • Breast cancer diagnosis and treatment significantly impact women's quality of life.
  • Reconstructive surgery is an option following mastectomy, aiming to restore physical appearance and well-being.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore women's perspectives on factors influencing their decisions regarding breast reconstruction after a breast cancer diagnosis.

Main Methods:

  • An exploratory, descriptive, qualitative study was conducted.
  • Eleven women who had undergone mastectomy and reconstruction were interviewed.
  • Interviews focused on decision-making, information needs, support systems, and key influencing factors.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • The overarching theme was 'Getting My Life Back,' encompassing 'Information Seeking,' 'Talking It Over,' and 'Seeking Normality.'
  • Healthcare provider interaction significantly influenced women's decision-making processes.
  • The decision-making journey was iterative, involving continuous information gathering and discussion.

    • Conclusions:

    • Breast reconstruction helped minimize negative consequences of breast cancer and treatment.
    • The decision-making process aimed to restore or improve women's lives to pre-diagnosis status.
    • Effective patient-provider communication and social support are crucial for satisfaction with reconstruction decisions.