Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reply

Posner1

  • 1Department of Neurology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, 10021, USA.

Gynecologic Oncology
|May 29, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study investigated the impact of copyright law on scientific research and innovation. Findings indicate that current copyright regulations may hinder the open dissemination of scientific knowledge.

Related Experiment Videos

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Of the Use of Stimulants in Inflammatory Diseases of the Lungs in Children.

Illinois medical and surgical journal·2023
Same author

Awareness and metacognition

Consciousness and cognition·2000
Same author

Term delivery after hospitalization for preterm labor: incidence and costs in california.

Primary care update for Ob/Gyns·2000
Same author

Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2000
Same author

The Prognostic Value of Thymidylate Synthase and p53 Expression in Patients Treated with Induction Chemotherapy for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.

The oncologist·1999
Same author

Brain Mechanisms of Cognitive Skills

Consciousness and cognition·1997
Same journal

Toward precision prognosis: Predicting recurrence-free survival in high-grade serous ovarian cancer patients using multi-time point clinical and computed tomography radiomics data.

Gynecologic oncology·2026
Same journal

Adjunctive sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors with progestins and endometrial cancer risk in benign uterine diseases and hyperplasia.

Gynecologic oncology·2026
Same journal

Updated patient-reported outcomes and the effect of disease progression on health-related quality of life in the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial of niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer.

Gynecologic oncology·2026
Same journal

PRO-PLATINUM: A randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study to investigate the efficacy of a probiotic intervention on the gut and vaginal microbiome of ovarian cancer patients undergoing treatment with platinum chemotherapy.

Gynecologic oncology·2026
Same journal

A second chance for the second look: Feasibility of laparoscopic HIPEC at the conclusion of upfront treatment for epithelial ovarian cancer.

Gynecologic oncology·2026
Same journal

Prognostic impact of time to first recurrence in low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma: A multicentric retrospective study from the French TMRG network.

Gynecologic oncology·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Intellectual Property Law
  • Scientific Communication

Background:

  • Copyright law traditionally protects original works of authorship.
  • The digital age presents new challenges for applying copyright to scientific research and data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the effects of copyright on scientific knowledge sharing.
  • To identify potential conflicts between copyright and open science principles.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of copyright legislation and case law.
  • Analysis of scholarly articles and policy documents.
  • Case studies of copyright impact on research dissemination.

Main Results:

  • Copyright restrictions can limit the reuse and adaptation of scientific findings.
  • Ambiguities in copyright law create uncertainty for researchers.
  • Open access initiatives aim to mitigate some of these challenges.

    • Conclusions:

    • Revisiting copyright frameworks may be necessary to foster greater scientific collaboration and innovation.
    • Balancing creator rights with public access is crucial for scientific progress.