Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Informed consent and psychiatric research

G Adshead1

  • 1Institute of Psychiatry, Department of Forensic Psychiatry, London, United Kingdom.

Annali Dell'Istituto Superiore Di Sanita
|January 1, 1997
PubMed
Summary

Research ethics in psychiatry face challenges due to patients' reduced competence. Ethical decisions require a relational approach, moving beyond individual rights to consider psychiatrist-patient and patient-society contexts.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Ethics of community psychiatry.

Current opinion in psychiatry·2005
Same author

Attachment in mental health institutions: a commentary.

Attachment & human development·2002
Same author

A vicious circle: transgenerational attachment representations in a case of factitious illness by proxy.

Attachment & human development·2001
Same author

Maternal behaviors associated with smothering: a preliminary descriptive study.

Child abuse & neglect·2000
Same author

Care or custody? Ethical dilemmas in forensic psychiatry.

Journal of medical ethics·2000
Same author

Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder.

The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science·2000

Area of Science:

  • Psychiatry
  • Bioethics
  • Clinical Research Ethics

Background:

  • The immediate benefit to individual patients is often not the primary goal of clinical research.
  • Psychiatric research subjects may have diminished mental capacity due to their conditions, complicating ethical considerations.
  • Existing ethical frameworks, focused on individual rights, may be insufficient for psychiatric research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the ethical challenges in psychiatric research stemming from patient vulnerability.
  • To propose an alternative ethical framework for psychiatric research that acknowledges relational contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of current ethical principles in research.
  • Exploration of the psychiatrist-patient and patient-society relationship dynamics.
  • Critique of individual rights-based ethical models in the context of psychiatry.

Main Results:

  • The inherent conflict between research objectives and immediate patient benefit poses ethical dilemmas.
  • Reduced mental competence in psychiatric patients creates specific challenges for informed consent and ethical oversight.
  • A relational ethics model offers a more suitable framework for navigating these complexities.

Conclusions:

  • Psychiatric research ethics necessitate a shift from an individualistic, rights-based approach.
  • Adopting a relational ethical perspective, emphasizing interconnectedness (psychiatrist-patient, patient-society), is crucial.
  • This relational model better accommodates the unique ethical landscape of psychiatric research and its participants.

Related Experiment Videos