[Biomechanical analysis of arch-guided molar distalization with super-elastic nickel-titanium springs]

The typical characteristics of orthodontic devices and their effectiveness during tooth movement are of major importance for the success of orthodontic treatment and the stability of the result. To investigate this situation, two typical tooth movements were simulated experimentally using an Orthodontic Measurement and Simulation System (OMSS). These were Distalisation of an upper last molar and Distalisation of a molar including fixation of the guiding arch to a distal supporting last molar. The movements were simulated by employing various different NiTi coil compression springs and two standard steel guiding arches with the dimensions 0.016" x 0.022" and 0.017" x 0.025". The six NiTi springs differed significantly in shape and force characteristics. The eccentric application of the orthodontic force system relative to the centre of resistance brings about a tilting of the tube and arch via molar rotation. Although the forces developed by the springs are relatively constant, frictional losses result in variations in the effective orthodontic forces. With progressive distalisation, the average frictional losses varied between 50% and 80% of the spring-generated force, and frictional variations increased. Lower frictional losses were seen with a 0.016" x 0.022" guiding arch as compared with one measuring 0.017" x 0.025". In comparison with distalisation of a last molar, fixation of the arch to a third molar was associated with higher frictional losses. The interaction of the springs with the tube-guiding arch system could be so powerful that frictional losses were detected already during the initial phase of movement, and in extreme cases led to cessation of distalisation. The rate of distalisation was not affected by the forces generated by the springs. For physiological reasons, therefore, springs developing smaller forces should be used preferentially.