Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Multifocal rod electroretinograms

D C Hood1, E J Wladis, S Shady

  • 1Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, USA.

Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|June 10, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Retinal ganglion cell and inner plexiform layer thickness measurements in regions of severe visual field sensitivity loss in patients with glaucoma.

Eye (London, England)·2012
Same author

Blue (S) cone pathway vulnerability: a test of a fragile receptor hypothesis.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Foveal sensitivity changes in retinitis pigmentosa.

Applied optics·2010
Same author

Eccentricity-dependent changes in local onset and offset responses in patients with progressive cone dystrophy.

Vision research·2007
Same author

Retinal nerve fibre thickness measured with optical coherence tomography accurately detects confirmed glaucomatous damage.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2007
Same author

Structural and functional assessment of the macular region in patients with glaucoma.

The British journal of ophthalmology·2006
Same journal

Impact of Subretinal Drusenoid Deposits on Ellipsoid Zone-Related Thickness Metrics.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Proteomic Profiling of Optic Nerves From SMOX-Deficient Mice Identifies Regulators of Neuroinflammation and Axonal Damage in Optic Neuritis.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Aflibercept and Faricimab Equipotently Restore Endothelial Barrier Function.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Spatial Decomposition of Longitudinal RNFL Maps Reveals Distinct Modes of Glaucomatous Progression With Structure-Function and Genetic Signatures.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

The CXXC1-IGFBP6 Axis Maintains Corneal Epithelial Differentiation via H3K4me3-Dependent Transcriptional Activation.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same journal

Archetypal Visual Field Analysis of Patients With Chronic Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy in Relation to Visual Recovery.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
See all related articles

Multifocal rod electroretinograms (ERGs) can be reliably obtained for clinical use by minimizing stray light. However, their signal-to-noise ratio is poorer than multifocal cone ERGs due to rod recovery times.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neuroscience
  • Retinal Physiology

Background:

  • Full-field electroretinograms (ERGs) provide a global measure of retinal function.
  • Multifocal ERGs (mfERGs) offer spatially resolved information about retinal responses.
  • Rod-mediated responses are crucial for scotopic vision, but their localization using mfERGs is challenging.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility of recording reliable multifocal rod electroretinograms (mfERGs).
  • To compare the characteristics of mfERGs with conventional full-field ERGs.
  • To determine the clinical utility of localized rod responses.

Main Methods:

  • Multifocal rod ERGs were recorded using a 61-hexagon stimulus array with varying inter-flash intervals (0-21 blank frames).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Full-field ERGs were elicited using flash trains mimicking multifocal sequences.
  • Blue flashes (W47B) were primarily used, with some red flashes (W26) to assess cone intrusion; flash intensities ranged from -1 to 1.7 log scot td-s.

    • Main Results:

    • Dark-adapted mfERGs showed an early focal component and a larger late component attributed to stray light.
    • The early component's amplitude was intensity-independent, confirming it as the focal rod response.
    • Comparison with full-field ERGs and a retinitis pigmentosa case demonstrated the focal response's localized nature.
    • The late component could be suppressed by adding a surround, reducing stray light effects.

    Conclusions:

    • Multifocal rod ERGs can be reliably recorded with sufficient localization for clinical applications by optimizing conditions to minimize stray light.
    • The signal-to-noise ratio of mfERGs is lower than that of multifocal cone ERGs due to the need for blank frames and slower rod recovery.
    • Despite signal-to-noise limitations, mfERGs provide valuable localized rod function data.