Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Setting bounds for the likelihood ratio when multiple hypotheses are postulated

J S Buckleton1, I W Evett, B S Weir

  • 1Interpretation Research Group, Forensic Science Service, London, United Kingdom.

Science & Justice : Journal of the Forensic Science Society
|June 13, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Global diversity analysis of plant-associated <i>Pseudopithomyces</i> fungi reveals a new species producing the toxin associated with facial eczema in livestock: <i>Pseudopithomyces toxicarius sp. nov</i>.

Studies in mycology·2026
Same author

<i>Fusarium</i>: more than a node or a foot-shaped basal cell.

Studies in mycology·2021
Same author

Phylogenetic relationships of eight new <i>Dacrymycetes</i> collected from New Zealand.

Persoonia·2017
Same author

Fungal Planet description sheets: 558-624.

Persoonia·2017
Same author

Reply to Morrison et al. (2016) Refining the relevant population in forensic voice comparison - A response to Hicks et alii (2015) The importance of distinguishing information from evidence/observations when formulating propositions.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2017
Same author

Finding the way forward for forensic science in the US-A commentary on the PCAST report.

Forensic science international·2017
Same journal

When termites mimic disease: Vertebral osteolysis and indoor scene alteration in the French West Indies.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

Forensic soil comparison for traffic accidents caused by soil clods on roadway.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

Chemical profiling of counterfeit perfumes: insights within a forensic intelligence approach.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

The forensic limits of hair drug testing: a critical assessment of drug intake and hair concentration relationships.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

Carrying the aftermath: forensic trauma as a predictable occupational injury in a lifecycle systems framework.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
Same journal

Footprint analysis in a subadult Slovak population (aged 10-18 years) for stature estimation: a preliminary study.

Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society·2026
See all related articles

Interpreting complex DNA mixtures in forensic science is challenging. Bayesian inference and likelihood ratios help weigh evidence, especially when the number of DNA contributors is uncertain.

Area of Science:

  • Forensic Science
  • Genetics
  • Statistics

Background:

  • DNA mixture interpretation poses significant challenges in forensic investigations.
  • Bayesian inference is the standard logical approach for analyzing forensic DNA evidence.
  • Likelihood ratios are commonly used to weigh evidence supporting competing hypotheses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the challenges in interpreting forensic DNA mixtures.
  • To present a method for handling situations where the number of contributors is disputed.
  • To extend the application of Bayesian inference in forensic DNA analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing Bayesian inference for DNA mixture analysis.
  • Formulating likelihood ratios to evaluate competing hypotheses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Developing a framework to address disputes regarding the number of DNA contributors.

    • Main Results:

    • Demonstrated a logical approach to interpreting complex DNA mixtures.
    • Provided a method for evaluating evidence when contributor numbers are uncertain.
    • Showcased the utility of Bayesian inference in complex forensic scenarios.

    Conclusions:

    • Bayesian inference provides a robust framework for forensic DNA mixture interpretation.
    • The proposed method offers a solution for disputed contributor numbers.
    • Accurate interpretation of DNA mixtures is crucial for justice.