Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Data analysis in multiple-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis

B H Cornish1, L C Ward

  • 1Centre for Health and Medical Physics, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Physiological Measurement
|June 17, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Measuring body composition in dogs using bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy.

Veterinary journal (London, England : 1997)·2024
Same author

Use of bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy to provide a measure of body composition in sows.

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience·2021
Same author

Reduction of breast lymphoedema secondary to breast cancer: a randomised controlled exercise trial.

Breast cancer research and treatment·2020
Same author

A randomized trial to examine the mechanisms of cognitive, behavioral and mindfulness-based psychosocial treatments for chronic pain: Study protocol.

Contemporary clinical trials·2020
Same author

Screening for breast cancer-related lymphoedema: self-assessment of symptoms and signs.

Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer·2019
Same author

Reliability of multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis: An intermachine comparison.

American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council·2017
Same journal

Continuous tracking of aortic aneurysm diameter with peripheral pulse waves: a computational framework combining sequential Markov chain Monte Carlo with Kalman filtering.

Physiological measurement·2026
Same journal

The 2026 global roadmap for textile-integrated wearable technologies in health.

Physiological measurement·2026
Same journal

Augmenting single-lead ECG interpretation through QRS waveform decomposition and rotation.

Physiological measurement·2026
Same journal

Dynamic Beat-to-Beat Blood Pressure Estimation using a Multi-modal Wearable Deep Learning Approach.

Physiological measurement·2026
Same journal

Dual warm-start fusion versus attention-based fusion in low-label ECG-PCG classification: a controlled ablation study.

Physiological measurement·2026
Same journal

Inter-patient multi-label ECG classification via low-rank adaptation fine-tuned large language models with dynamic graph convolutional network.

Physiological measurement·2026
See all related articles

The Cole-Cole model is the best method for analyzing multiple-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MFBIA) data. It accurately estimates impedance parameters, outperforming newer methods, especially at higher impedance values.

Area of Science:

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Electrical Engineering
  • Physiology

Background:

  • Multiple-frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis (MFBIA) is crucial for physiological measurements.
  • Accurate data analysis is essential for reliable MFBIA results.
  • Existing analytical methods require performance evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the performance of three analytical methods for MFBIA data.
  • To evaluate curve-fitting adequacy and accuracy of impedance parameter estimation.
  • To determine the optimal method for MFBIA data analysis.

Main Methods:

  • Assessed Cole and Cole method, Siconolfi method, and a modified Siconolfi procedure.
  • Evaluated curve-fitting using correlation coefficient and standard error of the estimate.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Determined accuracy by comparing estimated vs. theoretical impedance parameters in model circuits.

    • Main Results:

    • All methods showed good curve fitting (r=0.9, SEE ≤ 3.5%).
    • Cole-Cole modeling yielded the most accurate impedance estimates (1-2% variation).
    • Siconolfi method with polynomial regression showed 1-6% variation, but all methods failed at low impedances (<20 omega).

    Conclusions:

    • Cole-Cole modeling is the preferred method for MFBIA data analysis.
    • Accuracy is compromised at low impedance values due to instrument limitations.
    • Further research may be needed to address limitations at low impedance measurements.