Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Bilateral breast reconstruction

S S Kroll1

  • 1Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.

Clinics in Plastic Surgery
|June 17, 1998
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy and bilateral reconstruction offer a viable solution for select patients. This approach yields excellent aesthetic outcomes and symmetry, with only a marginal cost increase over unilateral procedures.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reconstructive management of contralateral breast cancer in patients who previously underwent unilateral breast reconstruction.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2001
Same author

Comparison of immediate and delayed free TRAM flap breast reconstruction in patients receiving postmastectomy radiation therapy.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2001
Same author

Thrombolytic therapy: what is its role in free flap salvage?

Annals of plastic surgery·2001
Same author

Aesthetically successful mandibular reconstruction with a single reconstruction plate.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2001
Same author

Comparison of cost for DIEP and free TRAM flap breast reconstructions.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2001
Same author

Comparison of the costs of DIEP and TRAM flaps.

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2001
Same journal

Lower-Extremity Reconstruction: Principles, Progress, and Perspectives.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Pediatric.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Lower Extremity Reconstruction in Acute Burns.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Chronic Lower Extremity Wounds: Updates on Lower Extremity Reconstruction in Clinics in Plastic Surgery.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Updates in Lower Extremity Reconstruction: Post Sarcoma.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
Same journal

Fillet Flaps for Lower Extremity Salvage.

Clinics in plastic surgery·2026
See all related articles

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Plastic Surgery
  • Reconstructive Surgery

Background:

  • Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) is an option for high-risk patients.
  • Bilateral reconstruction following CPM presents unique challenges and opportunities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss the techniques, advantages, and disadvantages of bilateral reconstruction after CPM.
  • To highlight the aesthetic and cost-effectiveness of bilateral breast reconstruction.

Main Methods:

  • Review of surgical techniques for bilateral breast reconstruction.
  • Analysis of aesthetic outcomes and patient satisfaction.
  • Cost comparison between unilateral and bilateral reconstruction.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Bilateral reconstruction can achieve exceptionally good aesthetic results.
  • Symmetry is a key advantage of the bilateral approach.
  • The cost of bilateral reconstruction is approximately 5% higher than unilateral reconstruction.

Conclusions:

  • Bilateral reconstruction is a favorable option for appropriate patients undergoing CPM.
  • Excellent symmetry and aesthetic outcomes are achievable.
  • The incremental cost is justifiable given the benefits.