Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2026

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
Published on: November 3, 2011
Comparative analysis of seven multiple protein sequence alignment servers: clues to enhance reliability of
P Briffeuil1, G Baudoux, C Lambert
1Laboratory of Molecular & Structural Biology, The University of Namur, 61 rue de Bruxelles, B-5000 Namur, Belgium.
Motivation:
The prediction reliability of seven multiple alignment servers currently available on the Internet (ClustalW, MAP, PIMA, Block Maker, MSA, MEME and Match-Box) has been evaluated in terms of power (sensitivity) and confidence (selectivity). Therefore, the alignments obtained have been respectively compared to refined structural alignments for 20 families of related proteins with low levels of identity.
Results:
Results clearly show that any powerful method remains reliable when the rate of identity falls. For some methods, power and confidence decrease linearly with the rate of identity, while other methods emphasize reliability at the cost of a lower power. Increasing the number of related sequences included in the alignment may either improve or decrease the quality of the predictions substantially. For some methods, the gain in power or in confidence is quite systematic; for others, the effect of the addition of homologous sequences is highly unpredictable. Extracting the consensus between two different methods may increase the overall confidence of the predictions tremendously. Our conclusions induce users of sequence alignment methods on the Internet to select the most suitable technique according to their requirements in terms of selectivity and sensitivity.
Availability:
The aligned sequences of the 20 alignments of structure can be obtained automatically by sending the message 'send: cabios_tests.txt' by e-mail to 'matchbox@biq.fundp.ac.be'.
Contact:
eric.depiereux@fundp.ac.be
More Related Videos
07:49Creating and Applying a Reference to Facilitate the Discussion and Classification of Proteins in a Diverse Group
Published on: August 16, 2017
05:08Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
Published on: July 8, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to form...
Protein Families
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Conservation of Protein Domains
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to form...
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Protein Networks
These interactions can be represented through maps depicting protein-protein interaction networks, represented as nodes and edges. Nodes are circles that are representative of a protein,...