Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Intended blinders in research

F Petersen, J Lyngbye, B Baekgaard

    Medicine and Law
    |July 1, 1998
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Science operates globally, influenced by various factors beyond pure research. A Danish case reveals how health authorities obstructed patient rights and consumer protection research, highlighting a political rather than scientific issue.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is associated with IRF7, BANK1 and TBX21 polymorphisms in two populations.

    European journal of neurology·2020
    Same author

    The Regulatory Role of the Oral Commensal Streptococcus mitis on Human Monocytes.

    Scandinavian journal of immunology·2017
    Same author

    Interstitial lung disease increases mortality in systemic sclerosis patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension without affecting hemodynamics and exercise capacity.

    Clinical rheumatology·2016
    Same author

    Bowel Ultrasonography in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

    Digestive diseases (Basel, Switzerland)·2015
    Same author

    Meta-analysis reveals an association of PTPN22 C1858T with autoimmune diseases, which depends on the localization of the affected tissue.

    Genes and immunity·2012
    Same author

    [Realisation of material costs in anaesthesia. Alternatives to the reimbursement via diagnosis-related groups].

    Der Anaesthesist·2007
    Same journal

    CRIMINAL CONDUCT DUE TO DRUNKENNESS: CRITICAL EVALUATION OF BRAZILIAN TRAFFIC LEGISLATION.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    TRANSDISCIPLINARITY IN STRATEGIC DECISIONS FOR ONCOLOGICAL TREATMENTS.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    LAWS RELATED TO THE PROTECTION OF WOMEN'S HEALTH IN JAPAN.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    ANTICIPATED DIRECTIVES OF WILL, ADVANCE HEALTH CARE DIRECTIVE, HEALTH CARE ATTORNEY: AN ISSUE OF SELF-DETERMINATION.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    HEALTH LAW AND ELDERLY PERSONS.

    Medicine and law·2019
    Same journal

    IS A 'NO FAULT' COMPENSATION SCHEME THE ANSWER TO THE PROBLEMS OF TORT IN CLINICAL NEGLIGENCE?

    Medicine and law·2019
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Science and Technology Studies
    • Health Policy Research

    Background:

    • Science is a global cognitive authority, transcending national borders.
    • Scientific practice is influenced by diverse factors including entrenched ideas, talent, trends, politics, lobbying, peer review, and conflicts of interest.
    • Understanding concealed scientific activities is crucial.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To examine the influence of external factors on scientific practice.
    • To present a case study on the obstruction of research related to patient rights and consumer protection.
    • To differentiate between political and scientific/medical issues in health authority decision-making.

    Main Methods:

    • Qualitative analysis of a specific case in Denmark.
    • Examination of the interplay between health authorities and research on patient rights.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Case study methodology.

    • Main Results:

    • Health authorities in Denmark utilized research on patient rights and consumer protection as a procedural obstacle.
    • The issue faced by authorities was primarily political, not inherently medical or scientific.
    • Concealed research activities can be of significant scientific interest.

    Conclusions:

    • External political factors can impede scientific research, even in areas concerning public welfare.
    • Distinguishing political motivations from scientific considerations is vital in health policy.
    • The case highlights the importance of transparency and the potential for research to be strategically blocked.