[Folk medicine, experience therapy, a component of modern therapeutics?]

Empirical medicine has three main supporting pillars: physical treatment, dietetics and phytotherapy. In this area of medicine, a number of therapeutical methods have been evolved which stand up to investigations employing scientific criteria, and which, in consequence, have become officially recognized by medical science. Examples are: diet rich in bulkage, digitalis, products of Papaver somniferum (Poppy) and salicylates. The acceptance of phytotherapeutic agents into the drug armamentarium of scientific medicine presupposes the availability of test methods suitable to demonstrate their effectiveness. Quite a number of remedies that have always been firmly anchored in empirical medicine, but which was applied regularly only by the nature healer, have suddenly, in the light of new test methods, been shown to be effective medicines; thus, for example, onions and garlic are good for thrombotic processes and hyperglycaemia, carminatives for sphincter spasms in the gastrointestinal tract, and alcohol is an appetite-stimulating stomachic. This fact, the limited applicability of the information obtained from animal experiments, and the further fact that even test results obtained in human subjects cannot be applied on a world-wide basis, exhort us to take care not to subscribe to an all-too apodictic classification of therapeutic measures into effective and noneffective. A further point for consideration is that the administration even of what is only a supposed remedy, can trigger or promote healing simply on the strength of the action of the physician. Scientific thinking is an indispensible precondition of the physician's activity--to consider it as the beginning and end of all things medical, however, is simply to demonstrate a narrowness of outlook.